How Android Apps Break the Data Minimization Principle: An Empirical Study
Shaokun Zhang, Hanwen Lei, Yuanpeng Wang, Ding Li, Yao Guo, Xiangqun Chen
Abstract
The Data Minimization Principle is crucial for protecting individual privacy. However, existing Android runtime permissions do not guarantee this principle. Moreover, the lack of an automatic enforcement mechanism leads to uncertainty as to whether apps strictly comply with this principle. To bridge this gap, we conduct the first systematic empirical study on violations of the Data Minimization Principle and design a new enforcement tool called GUIMind to detect them. GUIMind first utilizes a reinforcement learning model to explore app activities and monitor access to sensitive APIs that require sensitive permissions, and then it leverages an existing tool to detect such violations. We evaluate the performance of GUIMind using 120 real-world Android apps. The results indicate that GUIMind can achieve a detection accuracy of 96.1%, effectively accelerating the empirical study. Our empirical research is mainly focused on the prevalence of violations, the responses of administrators to violations, and the potential factors and characteristics that lead to violations, such as typical violations, app categories, and personal data types. Our study reveals that 83.5% of apps contain at least one privacy violation, with health apps being the most severe. In addition, telephony information is the most commonly leaked personal data type, accounting for 71.1%. Finally, we randomly selected 60 non-compliant apps for reporting to the administrator, whose responses confirm the effectiveness of our approach.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 657dca01-0a4f-4433-b99d-8fd52a46c702Cited by top-tier papers2
- Profile Coverage: Using Android Compilation Profiles to Evaluate Dynamic TestingJakob Bleier, Felix Kehrer, Jürgen Cito, Martina LindorferASE 2025
- GUIA uditor : Enabling Post-hoc Child Safety Forensics via Action-Guided GUI Provenance on Mobile DevicesJunlin Liu, Yifeng Cai, Shuai Wang, Zhineng Zhong et al.UbiComp 2026
Builds on14
- Automated Analysis of Privacy Requirements for Mobile AppsSebastian Zimmeck, Ziqi Wang, Lieyong Zou, Roger Iyengar et al.NDSS 2017 · 255 citations
- Reinforcement learning based curiosity-driven testing of Android applicationsMinxue Pan, An Huang, Guoxin Wang, Tian Zhang et al.ISSTA 2020 · 166 citations
- Harvesting Runtime Values in Android Applications That Feature Anti-Analysis TechniquesSiegfried Rasthofer, Steven Arzt, Marc Miltenberger, Eric BoddenNDSS 2016 · 157 citations
- Screen2Vec: Semantic Embedding of GUI Screens and GUI ComponentsToby Jia-Jun Li, Lindsay Popowski, Tom M. Mitchell, Brad A. MyersCHI 2021 · 72 citations
- Share First, Ask Later (or Never?) Studying Violations of GDPR's Explicit Consent in Android AppsTrung Tin Nguyen, Michael Backes, Ninja Marnau, Ben StockUSENIX Security 2021 · 70 citations
Related papers
- PTPDroid: Detecting Violated User Privacy Disclosures to Third-Parties of Android AppsZeya Tan, Wei SongICSE 2023 · 20 citations
- Freely Given Consent?: Studying Consent Notice of Third-Party Tracking and Its Violations of GDPR in Android AppsTrung Tin Nguyen, Michael Backes, Ben StockCCS 2022 · 32 citations
- Abandon All Hope Ye Who Enter Here: A Dynamic, Longitudinal Investigation of Android's Data Safety SectionIoannis Arkalakis, Michalis Diamantaris, Serafeim Moustakas, Sotiris Ioannidis et al.USENIX Security 2024 · 13 citations
- Uncovering Intent based Leak of Sensitive Data in Android FrameworkHao Zhou, Xiapu Luo, Haoyu Wang, Haipeng CaiCCS 2022 · 9 citations
- PolicyChecker: Analyzing the GDPR Completeness of Mobile Apps' Privacy PoliciesAnhao Xiang, Weiping Pei, Chuan YueCCS 2023 · 24 citations
