SEUF: Is Unlearning One Expert Enough for Mixture-of-Experts LLMs?
Haomin Zhuang, Yihua Zhang, Kehan Guo, Jinghan Jia, Gaowen Liu, Sijia Liu, Xiangliang Zhang
Abstract
Recent advancements in LLMs unlearning have shown remarkable success in removing unwanted data-model influences while preserving the model's utility for legitimate knowledge. Despite these strides, sparse Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) LLMs--a key subset of the LLM family--have remained unexplored in the context of unlearning. As MoE LLMs are celebrated for their exceptional performance, we ask:How can unlearning be performed effectively and efficiently on MoE LLMs? Our pilot study shows that the dynamic routing nature of MoE LLMs introduces unique challenges, leading to excessive forgetting, uncontrolled knowledge erasure and substantial utility drops when existing unlearning methods are applied. To address this, we propose a novel Selected-Expert Unlearning Framework (SEUF). Through expert attribution, unlearning is concentrated on the most actively engaged experts for the specified knowledge. Concurrently, an anchor loss is applied to the router to stabilize the active state of this targeted expert, ensuring focused and controlled unlearning. SEUF is compatible with various standard unlearning algorithms. Extensive experiments demonstrate that SEUF enhances both forget quality up to 5% and model utility by 35% on MoE LLMs across various benchmarks and LLM architectures (compared to standard unlearning algorithms), while only unlearning 0.06% of the model parameters.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 64a3e2ff-7938-476a-861b-cc2d5f898225Cited by top-tier papers3
- Sparse Models, Sparse Safety: Unsafe Routes in Mixture-of-Experts LLMsYukun Jiang, Hai Huang, Mingjie Li, Yage Zhang et al.ICML 2026 · 9 citations
- Downgrade to Upgrade: Optimizer Simplification Enhances Robustness in LLM UnlearningYicheng Lang, Yihua Zhang, Chongyu Fan, Changsheng Wang et al.ICLR 2026 · 4 citations
- Invariance Makes LLM Unlearning Resilient Even to Unanticipated Downstream Fine-TuningChangsheng Wang, Yihua Zhang, Jinghan Jia, Parikshit Ram et al.ICML 2025
Builds on24
- LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language ModelsEdward J. Hu, Yelong Shen, Phillip Wallis, Zeyuan Allen-Zhu et al.ICLR 2022 · 18,833 citations
- Measuring Massive Multitask Language UnderstandingDan Hendrycks, Collin Burns, Steven Basart, Andy Zou et al.ICLR 2021 · 7,905 citations
- Locating and Editing Factual Associations in GPTKevin Meng, David Bau, Alex Andonian, Yonatan BelinkovNeurIPS 2022 · 3,415 citations
- GShard: Scaling Giant Models with Conditional Computation and Automatic ShardingDmitry Lepikhin, HyoukJoong Lee, Yuanzhong Xu, Dehao Chen et al.ICLR 2021 · 1,954 citations
- Scaling Vision with Sparse Mixture of ExpertsCarlos Riquelme, Joan Puigcerver, Basil Mustafa, Maxim Neumann et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 1,213 citations
Related papers
- Routing Experts: Learning to Route Dynamic Experts in Existing Multi-modal Large Language ModelsQiong Wu, Zhaoxi Ke, Yiyi Zhou, Xiaoshuai Sun et al.ICLR 2025
- ReMoE: Fully Differentiable Mixture-of-Experts with ReLU RoutingZiteng Wang, Jun Zhu, Jianfei ChenICLR 2025
- Dynamic Expert Specialization: Towards Catastrophic Forgetting-Free Multi-Domain MoE AdaptationJunzhuo Li, Bo Wang, Xiuze Zhou, Xuming HuEMNLP 2025 · 5 citations
- Autonomy-of-Experts ModelsAng Lv, Ruobing Xie, Yining Qian, Songhao Wu et al.ICML 2025
- Merge, Then Compress: Demystify Efficient SMoE with Hints from Its Routing PolicyPingzhi Li, Zhenyu Zhang, Prateek Yadav, Yi-Lin Sung et al.ICLR 2024 · 97 citations
