Geometric Contact Potential
Zizhou Huang, Max Paik, Zachary Ferguson, Daniele Panozzo, Denis Zorin
Abstract
Barrier potentials gained popularity as a means for robust contact handling in physical modeling and for modeling self-avoiding shapes. The key to the success of these approaches is adherence to geometric constraints, i.e., avoiding intersections, which are the cause of most robustness problems in complex deformation simulation with contact. However, existing barrierpotential methods may lead to spurious forces and imperfect satisfaction of the geometric constraints. They may have strong resolution dependence, requiring careful adaptation of the potential parameters to the object discretizations.
We present a systematic derivation of a continuum potential defined for smooth and piecewise smooth surfaces, starting from identifying a set of natural requirements for contact potentials, including the barrier property, locality, differentiable dependence on shape, and absence of forces in rest configurations. Our potential is formulated independently of surface discretization and addresses the shortcomings of existing potential-based methods while retaining their advantages.
We present a discretization of our potential that is a drop-in replacement for the potential used in the incremental potential contact formulation [Li et al. 2020], and compare its behavior to other potential formulations, demonstrating that it has the expected behavior. The presented formulation connects existing barrier approaches, as all recent existing methods can be viewed as a variation of the presented potential, and lays a foundation for developing alternative (e.g., higher-order) versions.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 628dbf24-262f-465b-8767-e9027c7bff13Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on10
- Incremental potential contact: intersection-and inversion-free, large-deformation dynamicsMinchen Li, Zachary Ferguson, Teseo Schneider, Timothy R. Langlois et al.SIGGRAPH 2020 · 320 citations
- Codimensional incremental potential contactMinchen Li, Danny M. Kaufman, Chenfanfu JiangSIGGRAPH 2021 · 117 citations
- Intersection-free rigid body dynamicsZachary Ferguson, Minchen Li, Teseo Schneider, Francisca Gil Ureta et al.SIGGRAPH 2021 · 83 citations
- Simple and scalable frictional contacts for thin nodal objectsGilles DavietSIGGRAPH 2020 · 50 citations
- Affine body dynamics: fast, stable and intersection-free simulation of stiff materialsLei Lan, Danny M. Kaufman, Minchen Li, Chenfanfu Jiang et al.SIGGRAPH 2022 · 46 citations
Related papers
- Distributed Affine Body Dynamics with Adaptive ConsensusJiafeng Liu, Wenhui Zhou, Xinming Pei, Yifan Peng et al.SIGGRAPH 2026
- Untangling Surfaces via Shape and Mesh RepulsionJirí Minarcík, Michael Liu, Keenan Crane, Minchen LiSIGGRAPH 2026
- Penetration-free projective dynamics on the GPULei Lan, Guanqun Ma, Yin Yang, Changxi Zheng et al.SIGGRAPH 2022 · 49 citations
- Shortest Path to Boundary for Self-Intersecting MeshesHe Chen, Elie Diaz, Cem YukselSIGGRAPH 2023 · 12 citations
- Medial IPC: accelerated incremental potential contact with medial elasticsLei Lan, Yin Yang, Danny M. Kaufman, Junfeng Yao et al.SIGGRAPH 2021 · 41 citations
