Controllable Guarantees for Fair Outcomes via Contrastive Information Estimation
Umang Gupta, Aaron M. Ferber, Bistra Dilkina, Greg Ver Steeg
Abstract
Controlling bias in training datasets is vital for ensuring equal treatment, or parity, between different groups in downstream applications. A naive solution is to transform the data so that it is statistically independent of group membership, but this may throw away too much information when a reasonable compromise between fairness and accuracy is desired. Another common approach is to limit the ability of a particular adversary who seeks to maximize parity. Unfortunately, representations produced by adversarial approaches may still retain biases as their efficacy is tied to the complexity of the adversary used during training. To this end, we theoretically establish that by limiting the mutual information between representations and protected attributes, we can assuredly control the parity of any downstream classifier. We demonstrate an effective method for controlling parity through mutual information based on contrastive information estimators and show that they outperform approaches that rely on variational bounds based on complex generative models. We test our approach on UCI Adult and Heritage Health datasets and demonstrate that our approach provides more informative representations across a range of desired parity thresholds while providing strong theoretical guarantees on the parity of any downstream algorithm.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 628a890a-260f-46d5-b98d-3bd2c3e9461dCited by top-tier papers21
- Fair Normalizing FlowsMislav Balunovic, Anian Ruoss, Martin T. VechevICLR 2022 · 46 citations
- Understanding Instance-Level Impact of Fairness ConstraintsJialu Wang, Xin Eric Wang, Yang LiuICML 2022 · 41 citations
- Fair Representation Learning for Recommendation: A Mutual Information PerspectiveChen Zhao, Le Wu, Pengyang Shao, Kun Zhang et al.AAAI 2023 · 37 citations
- Fair Representation Learning through Implicit Path AlignmentChangjian Shui, Qi Chen, Jiaqi Li, Boyu Wang et al.ICML 2022 · 32 citations
- Tight Mutual Information Estimation With Contrastive Fenchel-Legendre OptimizationQing Guo, Junya Chen, Dong Wang, Yuewei Yang et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 28 citations
Builds on3
- A Theory of Usable Information under Computational ConstraintsYilun Xu, Shengjia Zhao, Jiaming Song, Russell Stewart et al.ICLR 2020 · 211 citations
- Invariant Representations through Adversarial ForgettingAyush Jaiswal, Daniel Moyer, Greg Ver Steeg, Wael AbdAlmageed et al.AAAI 2020 · 46 citations
- A Free-Energy Principle for Representation LearningYansong Gao, Pratik ChaudhariICML 2020 · 11 citations
Related papers
- Controllable Universal Fair Representation LearningYue Cui, Chen Ma, Kai Zheng, Lei Chen et al.WWW 2023 · 5 citations
- Data preprocessing to mitigate bias: A maximum entropy based approachL. Elisa Celis, Vijay Keswani, Nisheeth K. VishnoiICML 2020 · 45 citations
- Fair Representation Learning: An Alternative to Mutual InformationJi Liu, Zenan Li, Yuan Yao, Feng Xu et al.KDD 2022 · 14 citations
- FADES: Fair Disentanglement with Sensitive RelevanceTaeuk Jang, Xiaoqian WangCVPR 2024
- Exploiting MMD and Sinkhorn Divergences for Fair and Transferable Representation LearningLuca Oneto, Michele Donini, Giulia Luise, Carlo Ciliberto et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 56 citations
