ProfiliTable: Profiling-Driven Tabular Data Processing via Agentic Workflows
Wei Liu, Yang Gu, Xi Yan, Zihan Nan, Beicheng Xu, Keyao Ding, Bin Cui, Wentao Zhang
Abstract
Table processing—including cleaning, transformation, augmentation, and matching—is a foundational yet error-prone stage in real-world data pipelines. While recent LLM-based approaches show promise for automating such tasks, they often struggle in practice due to ambiguous instructions, complex task structures, and the lack of structured feedback, resulting in syntactically correct but semantically flawed code. To address these challenges, we propose ProfiliTable, an autonomous multi-agent framework centered on dynamic profiling, which constructs and iteratively refines a unified execution context through interactive exploration, knowledge-augmented synthesis, and feedback-driven refinement. ProfiliTable integrates (i) a Profiler that performs ReAct-style data exploration to build semantic understanding, (ii) a Generator that retrieves curated operators to synthesize task-aware code, and (iii) a joint Evaluator–Summarizer module that injects execution scores and diagnostic insights to enable closed-loop refinement. Extensive experiments on a diverse benchmark covering 18 tabular task types demonstrate that ProfiliTable consistently outperforms strong baselines, particularly in complex multi-step scenarios. These results highlight the critical role of dynamic profiling in reliably translating ambiguous user intents into robust and governance-compliant table transformations.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 6265f5f5-afae-4025-8a0a-7dba77484225Builds on16
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
- CAMEL: Communicative Agents for "Mind" Exploration of Large Language Model SocietyGuohao Li, Hasan Hammoud, Hani Itani, Dmitrii Khizbullin et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 1,975 citations
- "Everyone wants to do the model work, not the data work": Data Cascades in High-Stakes AINithya Sambasivan, Shivani Kapania, Hannah Highfill, Diana Akrong et al.CHI 2021 · 725 citations
- DS-1000: A Natural and Reliable Benchmark for Data Science Code GenerationYuhang Lai, Chengxi Li, Yiming Wang, Tianyi Zhang et al.ICML 2023 · 504 citations
- Can Foundation Models Wrangle Your Data?Avanika Narayan, Ines Chami, Laurel J. Orr, Christopher RéVLDB 2023 · 325 citations
Related papers
- AutoPrep: Natural Language Question-Aware Data Preparation with a Multi-Agent FrameworkMeihao Fan, Ju Fan, Nan Tang, Lei Cao et al.VLDB 2025 · 10 citations
- Dango: A Mixed-Initiative Data Wrangling System using Large Language ModelWei-Hao Chen, Weixi Tong, Amanda Case, Tianyi ZhangCHI 2025 · 19 citations
- DeepPrep: An LLM-Powered Agentic System for Autonomous Data PreparationMeihao Fan, Ju Fan, Yuxin Zhang, Shaolei Zhang et al.VLDB 2026 · 4 citations
- Memory-Augmented LLM-based Multi-Agent System for Automated Feature Generation on Tabular DataFengxian Dong, Zhi Zheng, Xiao Han, Wei Chen et al.ACL 2026
- ReAcTable: Enhancing ReAct for Table Question AnsweringYunjia Zhang, Jordan Henkel, Avrilia Floratou, Joyce Cahoon et al.VLDB 2024 · 120 citations
