ReAcTable: Enhancing ReAct for Table Question Answering
Yunjia Zhang, Jordan Henkel, Avrilia Floratou, Joyce Cahoon, Shaleen Deep, Jignesh M. Patel
Abstract
Table Question Answering (TQA) presents a substantial challenge at the intersection of natural language processing and data analytics. This task involves answering natural language (NL) questions on top of tabular data, demanding proficiency in logical reasoning, understanding of data semantics, and fundamental analytical capabilities. Due to its significance, a substantial volume of research has been dedicated to exploring a wide range of strategies aimed at tackling this challenge including approaches that leverage Large Language Models (LLMs) through in-context learning or Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompting as well as approaches that train and fine-tune custom models.
Nonetheless, a conspicuous gap exists in the research landscape, where there is limited exploration of how innovative foundational research, which integrates incremental reasoning with external tools in the context of LLMs, as exemplified by the ReAct paradigm, could potentially bring advantages to the TQA task. In this paper, we aim to fill this gap, by introducing ReAcTable ( ReAct for Table Question Answering tasks), a framework inspired by the ReAct paradigm that is carefully enhanced to address the challenges uniquely appearing in TQA tasks such as interpreting complex data semantics, dealing with errors generated by inconsistent data and generating intricate data transformations. ReAcTable relies on external tools such as SQL and Python code executors, to progressively enhance the data by generating intermediate data representations, ultimately transforming it into a more accessible format for answering the user's questions with greater ease. Through extensive empirical evaluations using three popular TQA benchmarks, we demonstrate that ReAcTable achieves remarkable performance even when compared to fine-tuned approaches. In particular, it outperforms the best prior result on the WikiTQ benchmark by 2.1%, achieving an accuracy of 68.0% without requiring training a new model or fine-tuning.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers33
- GPTuner: A Manual-Reading Database Tuning System via GPT-Guided Bayesian OptimizationJiale Lao, Yibo Wang, Yufei Li, Jianping Wang et al.VLDB 2024 · 76 citations
- CodeV: Code with Images for Faithful Visual Reasoning via Tool-Aware Policy OptimizationXinhai Hou, Shaoyuan Xu, Manan Biyani, Moyan Li et al.CVPR 2026 · 25 citations
- Beluga: A CXL-Based Memory Architecture for Scalable and Efficient LLM KVCache ManagementXinjun Yang, Qingda Hu, Junru Li, Feifei Li et al.SIGMOD 2026 · 24 citations
- TableMaster: A Recipe to Advance Table Understanding with Language ModelsLang Cao, Hanbing LiuICLR 2026 · 20 citations
- MultiVis-Agent: A Multi-Agent Framework with Logic Rules for Reliable and Comprehensive Cross-Modal Data VisualizationJinwei Lu, Yuanfeng Song, Chen Zhang, Raymond Chi-Wing WongSIGMOD 2026 · 14 citations
Builds on14
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 citations
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
- Tree of Thoughts: Deliberate Problem Solving with Large Language ModelsShunyu Yao, Dian Yu, Jeffrey Zhao, Izhak Shafran et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 5,068 citations
- Graph of Thoughts: Solving Elaborate Problems with Large Language ModelsMaciej Besta, Nils Blach, Ales Kubicek, Robert Gerstenberger et al.AAAI 2024 · 1,292 citations
- True Few-Shot Learning with Language ModelsEthan Perez, Douwe Kiela, Kyunghyun ChoNeurIPS 2021 · 547 citations
Related papers
- Table Question Answering in the Era of Large Language Models: A Comprehensive Survey of Tasks, Methods, and EvaluationWei Zhou, Bolei Ma, Annemarie Friedrich, Mohsen MesgarACL 2026 · 3 citations
- API-Assisted Code Generation for Question Answering on Varied Table StructuresYihan Cao, Shuyi Chen, Ryan Liu, Zhiruo Wang et al.EMNLP 2023 · 6 citations
- Chain-of-Table: Evolving Tables in the Reasoning Chain for Table UnderstandingZilong Wang, Hao Zhang, Chun-Liang Li, Julian Martin Eisenschlos et al.ICLR 2024 · 244 citations
- Weaver: Interweaving SQL and LLM for Table ReasoningRohit Khoja, Devanshu Gupta, Yanjie Fu, Dan Roth et al.EMNLP 2025 · 1 citation
- When TableQA Meets Noise: A Dual Denoising Framework for Complex Questions and Large-scale TablesShenghao Ye, Yu Guo, Dong Jin, Yuxiang Wang et al.ACL 2026 · 8 citations
