"Do You Want Me to Participate or Not?": Investigating the Accessibility of Software Development Meetings for Blind and Low Vision Professionals
Yoonha Cha, Isabela Figueira, Jessy Ayala, Emory James Edwards, Joshua Garcia, André van der Hoek, Stacy Marie Branham
Abstract
Scholars have investigated numerous barriers to accessible software development tools and processes for Blind and Low Vision (BLV) developers. However, the research community has yet to study the accessibility of software development meetings, which are known to play a crucial role in software development practice. We conducted semi-structured interviews with 26 BLV software professionals about software development meeting accessibility. We found four key themes related to in-person and remote software development meetings: (1) participants observed that certain meeting activities and software tools used in meetings were inaccessible, (2) participants performed additional labor in order to make meetings accessible, (3) participants avoided disclosing their disability during meetings due to fear of career repercussions, (4) participants suggested technical, social and organizational solutions for accessible meetings, including developing their own solutions. We suggest recommendations and design implications for future accessible software development meetings including technical and policy-driven solutions.
Ask about this paper
Ask your agent about it.
Lune has read the top-tier papers around this one, so every answer names the papers it rests on.
Your agent calls
Lunesearch_papers
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers get 6139cdbe-4870-4bbd-baf7-b73655111082Cited by top-tier papers9
- The Sky is the Limit: Understanding How Generative AI can Enhance Screen Reader Users' Experience with Productivity ApplicationsMinoli Perera, Swamy Ananthanarayan, Cagatay Goncu, Kim MarriottCHI 2025 · 12 citations
- The Dilemma of Building Do-It-Yourself (DIY) Solutions For Workplace AccessibilityYoonha Cha, Victoria Jackson, Karina Kohl, Rafael Prikladnicki et al.CHI 2025 · 12 citations
- The Accessibility Paradox: How Blind and Low Vision Employees Experience and Negotiate Accessibility in the Technology IndustryAparajita Marathe, Anne Marie PiperCSCW 2025 · 7 citations
- Exclusion Rates among Disabled and Older Users of Virtual and Augmented RealityRosella P. Galindo Esparza, John J. Dudley, Vanja Garaj, Per Ola KristenssonCHI 2025 · 4 citations
- Accessibility-Driven Information Transformations in Mixed-Visual Ability Work TeamsYichun Zhao, Miguel A. Nacenta, Mahadeo A. Sukhai, Sowmya SomanathCHI 2026 · 2 citations
Related papers
- "Game Changer" or "Overenthusiastic Drunk Acquaintance"? Generative AI Use by Blind and Low Vision Software Professionals in the WorkplaceYoonha Cha, Victoria Jackson, Lauren Shu, Stacy Branham et al.ICSE 2026
- Accessibility Barriers, Conflicts, and Repairs: Understanding the Experience of Professionals with Disabilities in Hybrid MeetingsRahaf Alharbi, John C. Tang, Karl HendersonCHI 2023 · 47 citations
- Disability Meets Modality: A Sociotechnical Approach to Team MeetingsConnie Siebold, Susannah B. F. Paletz, Roni Reiter-Palmon, Shevaun Lewis et al.CSCW 2025 · 1 citation
- #A11yDev: Understanding Contemporary Software Accessibility Practices from Twitter ConversationsSyed Fatiul Huq, Abdulaziz Alshayban, Ziyao He, Sam MalekCHI 2023 · 17 citations
- Usability, Accessibility and Social Entanglements in Advanced Tool Use by Vision Impaired Graduate StudentsKristen Shinohara, Murtaza Tamjeed, Michael McQuaid, Dymen A. BarkinsCSCW 2022 · 10 citations
