Micro-architectural Analysis of OLAP: Limitations and Opportunities
Utku Sirin, Anastasia Ailamaki
Abstract
Understanding micro-architectural behavior is profound in efficiently using hardware resources. Recent work has shown that, despite being aggressively optimized for modern hardware, in-memory online transaction processing (OLTP) systems severely underutilize their core micro-architecture resources [25] . Online analytical processing (OLAP) workloads, on the other hand, exhibit a completely different computing pattern. OLAP workloads are read-only, bandwidthintensive and include various data access patterns including both sequential and random data accesses. In addition, with the rise of column-stores, they run on high performance engines that are tightly optimized for the efficient use of modern hardware. Hence, the micro-architectural behavior of modern OLAP systems remains unclear. This work presents the micro-architectural analysis of a breadth of OLAP systems. We examine CPU cycles and memory bandwidth utilization. The results show that, unlike the traditional, commercial OLTP systems, traditional, commercial OLAP systems do not suffer from instruction cache misses. Nevertheless, they suffer from their large instruction footprint resulting in slow response times. High performance OLAP engines execute tight instruction streams; however, they spend 25 to 82% of the CPU cycles on stalls regardless the workload being sequential-or random-accessheavy. In addition, high performance OLAP engines underutilize the multi-core CPU or memory bandwidth resources due to their disproportional compute and memory demands. Hence, analytical processing engines should carefully assign their compute and memory resources for efficient multi-core micro-architectural utilization.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers4
- CoroBase: Coroutine-Oriented Main-Memory Database EngineYongjun He, Jiacheng Lu, Tianzheng WangVLDB 2021 · 42 citations
- Maximizing Persistent Memory Bandwidth Utilization for OLAP WorkloadsBjörn Daase, Lars Jonas Bollmeier, Lawrence Benson, Tilmann RablSIGMOD 2021 · 38 citations
- GPU Database Systems Characterization and OptimizationJiashen Cao, Rathijit Sen, Matteo Interlandi, Joy Arulraj et al.VLDB 2024 · 36 citations
- Profiling Hyperscale Big Data ProcessingAbraham Gonzalez, Aasheesh Kolli, Samira Manabi Khan, Sihang Liu et al.ISCA 2023 · 30 citations
Related papers
- Taking Analytic Databases to the BankAlexandar Devic, Martin Prammer, Kevin P. Gaffney, Siddhartha Balakrishna Rai et al.ISCA 2026
- PUSHtap: PIM-based In-Memory HTAP with Unified Data Storage FormatYilong Zhao, Mingyu Gao, Huanchen Zhang, Fangxin Liu et al.ASPLOS 2025 · 4 citations
- Proteus: Autonomous Adaptive Storage for Mixed WorkloadsMichael Abebe, Horatiu Lazu, Khuzaima DaudjeeSIGMOD 2022 · 20 citations
- No Cap, This Memory Slaps: Breaking Through the Memory Wall of Transactional Database Systems with Processing-in-MemoryHyoungjoo Kim, Yiwei Zhao, Andrew Pavlo, Phillip B. GibbonsVLDB 2025 · 7 citations
- Sharing Opportunities for OLTP Workloads in Different Isolation LevelsRobin Rehrmann, Carsten Binnig, Alexander Böhm, Kihong Kim et al.VLDB 2020 · 8 citations
