ACL Findings2026
Poller: Are LLMs Suitable for Evaluating Poetry Understanding Task?
Shanshan Wang, Derek F. Wong, Jingming Yao, Lidia S. Chao
Abstract
Traditional automatic evaluation methods have been shown to be unsuitable for modern Chinese poetry because of the distinct nature of this literary genre. Human evaluation remains reliable, but is expensive and not applicable to large-scale data. In this paper, we propose Poller (Poetry LLM Evaluator), a novel method leveraging large language models (LLMs) to evaluate the poetry understanding task. Specifically, our method requires LLMs to play the role of a poem's author with detailed information, thereby emulating human evaluation and judgment by adopting the poet's perspective. We conducted comprehensive experiments on multiple LLMs, evaluating the interpretations of poems across eight specialized dimensions. Experimental results demonstrate that our method effectively reduces the evaluation error between LLMs and humans. Especially for specific dimension evaluation, Pollerbased LLMs achieve a 94.55% and 89.53% error reduction for rhetorical techniques and defamiliarization, respectively, compared to baseline methods. These performances are unattainable by conventional LLM evaluation methods. Experimental results from multiple LLMs across various dimensions validate the efficacy of our method. This work bridges the gap between automated efficiency and human expertise, establishing a foundation for automated evaluation in poetry-related tasks.
Ask Lune
Ask anything. The answer quotes the paper.
Lune reads all of it and the papers around it, then shows you the passages behind every answer.
Builds on18
- ChatEval: Towards Better LLM-based Evaluators through Multi-Agent DebateChi-Min Chan, Weize Chen, Yusheng Su, Jianxuan Yu et al.ICLR 2024 · 871 citations
- LLM Evaluators Recognize and Favor Their Own GenerationsArjun Panickssery, Samuel R. Bowman, Shi FengNeurIPS 2024 · 865 citations
- G-Eval: NLG Evaluation using Gpt-4 with Better Human AlignmentYang Liu, Dan Iter, Yichong Xu, Shuohang Wang et al.EMNLP 2023 · 549 citations
- PandaLM: An Automatic Evaluation Benchmark for LLM Instruction Tuning OptimizationYidong Wang, Zhuohao Yu, Wenjin Yao, Zhengran Zeng et al.ICLR 2024 · 368 citations
- Can Large Language Models Be an Alternative to Human Evaluations?David Cheng-Han Chiang, Hung-yi LeeACL 2023 · 254 citations
Related papers
- Capabilities and Evaluation Biases of Large Language Models in Classical Chinese Poetry Generation: A Case Study on Tang PoetryBolei Ma, Yina Yao, Anna-Carolina HaenschACL Findings 2026
- POEMetric: The Last Stanza of HumanityBingru Li, Han Wang, Hazel WilkinsonICLR 2026 · 2 citations
- Benchmarking LLMs for Translating Classical Chinese Poetry: Evaluating Adequacy, Fluency, and EleganceAndong Chen, Lianzhang Lou, Kehai Chen, Xuefeng Bai et al.EMNLP 2025
- Can Large Language Models Outperform Non-Experts in Poetry Evaluation? A Comparative Study Using the Consensual Assessment TechniquePiotr Sawicki, Marek Grzes, Dan Brown, Fabrício GóesEMNLP 2025
- Benchmarking the Detection of LLMs-Generated Modern Chinese PoetryShanshan Wang, Junchao Wu, Fengying Ye, Derek F. Wong et al.EMNLP Findings 2025 · 1 citation
