Auto-PRE: An Automatic and Cost-Efficient Peer-Review Framework for Language Generation Evaluation
Junjie Chen, Weihang Su, Zhumin Chu, Haitao Li, Yujia Zhou, Dingbo Yuan, Xudong Wang, Jun Zhou, Yiqun Liu, Min Zhang, Shaoping Ma, Qingyao Ai
Abstract
The rapid development of large language models (LLMs) has highlighted the need for efficient and reliable methods to evaluate their performance. Traditional evaluation methods often face challenges like high costs, limited task formats, dependence on human references, and systematic biases. To address these limitations, we propose Auto-PRE, an automatic LLM evaluation framework inspired by the peer review process. Unlike previous approaches that rely on human annotations, Auto-PRE automatically selects evaluator LLMs based on three core traits: consistency, pertinence, and self-confidence, which correspond to the instruction, content, and response stages, respectively, and collectively cover the entire evaluation process. Experiments on three representative tasks, including summarization, non-factoid QA, and dialogue generation, demonstrate that Auto-PRE achieves state-of-the-art performance while significantly reducing evaluation costs. Furthermore, the structured and scalable design of our automatic qualification exam framework provides valuable insights into automating the evaluation of LLMs-as-judges, paving the way for more advanced LLM-based evaluation frameworks.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 61022f3e-aa4a-4088-9192-d7014db0e3f2Builds on7
- BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTTianyi Zhang, Varsha Kishore, Felix Wu, Kilian Q. Weinberger et al.ICLR 2020 · 8,443 citations
- Deberta: decoding-Enhanced Bert with Disentangled AttentionPengcheng He, Xiaodong Liu, Jianfeng Gao, Weizhu ChenICLR 2021 · 3,729 citations
- ChatEval: Towards Better LLM-based Evaluators through Multi-Agent DebateChi-Min Chan, Weize Chen, Yusheng Su, Jianxuan Yu et al.ICLR 2024 · 871 citations
- PandaLM: An Automatic Evaluation Benchmark for LLM Instruction Tuning OptimizationYidong Wang, Zhuohao Yu, Wenjin Yao, Zhengran Zeng et al.ICLR 2024 · 368 citations
- Evaluating Large Language Models at Evaluating Instruction FollowingZhiyuan Zeng, Jiatong Yu, Tianyu Gao, Yu Meng et al.ICLR 2024 · 299 citations
Related papers
- LLM-Powered Benchmark Factory: Reliable, Generic, and EfficientPeiwen Yuan, Shaoxiong Feng, Yiwei Li, Xinglin Wang et al.ACL 2026 · 8 citations
- CalibraEval: Calibrating Prediction Distribution to Mitigate Selection Bias in LLMs-as-JudgesHaitao Li, Junjie Chen, Qingyao Ai, Zhumin Chu et al.ACL 2025
- PiCO: Peer Review in LLMs based on Consistency OptimizationKun-Peng Ning, Shuo Yang, Yuyang Liu, Jia-Yu Yao et al.ICLR 2025
- Praetor: A Fine-Grained Generative LLM Evaluator with Instance-Level Customizable Evaluation CriteriaYongqi Leng, Renren Jin, Yue Chen, Zhuowen Han et al.ACL 2025
- Autonomous Evaluation of LLMs for Truth Maintenance and Reasoning TasksRushang Karia, Daniel Bramblett, Daksh Dobhal, Siddharth SrivastavaICLR 2025
