A Variational Framework for Estimating Continuous Treatment Effects with Measurement Error
Erdun Gao, Howard D. Bondell, Wei Huang, Mingming Gong
Abstract
Estimating treatment effects has numerous real-world applications in various fields, such as epidemiology and political science. While much attention has been devoted to addressing the challenge using fully observational data, there has been comparatively limited exploration of this issue in cases when the treatment is not directly observed. In this paper, we tackle this problem by developing a general variational framework, which is flexible to integrate with advanced neural networkbased approaches, to identify the average dose-response function (ADRF) with the continuously valued error-contaminated treatment. Our approach begins with the formulation of a probabilistic data generation model, treating the unobserved treatment as a latent variable. In this model, we leverage a learnable density estimation neural network to derive its prior distribution conditioned on covariates. This module also doubles as a generalized propensity score estimator, effectively mitigating selection bias arising from observed confounding variables. Subsequently, we calculate the posterior distribution of the treatment, taking into account the observed measurement and outcome. To mitigate the impact of treatment error, we introduce a re-parametrized treatment value, replacing the error-affected one, to make more accurate predictions regarding the outcome. To demonstrate the adaptability of our framework, we incorporate two state-of-the-art ADRF estimation methods and rigorously assess its efficacy through extensive simulations and experiments using semi-synthetic data.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers4
- Causal-EPIG: Causally Aligned Active CATE EstimationErdun Gao, Jake Fawkes, Dino SejdinovicICML 2026 · 3 citations
- Observationally Informed Adaptive Causal Experimental DesignErdun Gao, Liang Zhang, Jake Fawkes, Aoqi Zuo et al.KDD 2026 · 1 citation
- ActiveCQ: Active Estimation of Causal QuantitiesErdun Gao, Dino SejdinovicICLR 2026 · 1 citation
- Projection Pursuit Density Ratio EstimationMeilin Wang, Wei Huang, Mingming Gong, Zheng ZhangICML 2025
Builds on6
- Self-Supervised Learning with Data Augmentations Provably Isolates Content from StyleJulius von Kügelgen, Yash Sharma, Luigi Gresele, Wieland Brendel et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 421 citations
- Learning Disentangled Representations for CounterFactual RegressionNegar Hassanpour, Russell GreinerICLR 2020 · 176 citations
- Learning Counterfactual Representations for Estimating Individual Dose-Response CurvesPatrick Schwab, Lorenz Linhardt, Stefan Bauer, Joachim M. Buhmann et al.AAAI 2020 · 159 citations
- Estimating the Effects of Continuous-valued Interventions using Generative Adversarial NetworksIoana Bica, James Jordon, Mihaela van der SchaarNeurIPS 2020 · 137 citations
- VCNet and Functional Targeted Regularization For Learning Causal Effects of Continuous TreatmentsLizhen Nie, Mao Ye, Qiang Liu, Dan NicolaeICLR 2021 · 81 citations
Related papers
- Generalization Bounds for Estimating Causal Effects of Continuous TreatmentsXin Wang, Shengfei Lyu, Xingyu Wu, Tianhao Wu et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 38 citations
- A Neural Mean Embedding Approach for Back-door and Front-door AdjustmentLiyuan Xu, Arthur GrettonICLR 2023
- Estimating Continuous Treatment Effects with Two-Stage Kernel Ridge RegressionSeok-Jin Kim, Kaizheng WangICML 2026 · 1 citation
- Adversarially Balanced Representation for Continuous Treatment Effect EstimationAmirreza Kazemi, Martin EsterAAAI 2024 · 8 citations
- Scalable Sensitivity and Uncertainty Analyses for Causal-Effect Estimates of Continuous-Valued InterventionsAndrew Jesson, Alyson Douglas, Peter Manshausen, Maëlys Solal et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 32 citations
