Chaining the Evidence: Robust Reinforcement Learning for Deep Search Agents with Citation-Aware Rubric Rewards
Jiajie Zhang, Xin Lv, Ling Feng, Lei Hou, Juanzi Li
Abstract
Reinforcement learning (RL) has emerged as a critical technique for enhancing LLM-based deep search agents. However, existing approaches primarily rely on binary outcome rewards, which fail to capture the comprehensiveness and factuality of agents'reasoning process, and often lead to undesirable behaviors such as shortcut exploitation and hallucinations. To address these limitations, we propose Citation-aware Rubric Rewards (CaRR), a fine-grained reward framework for deep search agents that emphasizes reasoning comprehensiveness, factual grounding, and evidence connectivity. CaRR decomposes complex questions into verifiable single-hop rubrics and requires agents to satisfy these rubrics by explicitly identifying hidden entities, supporting them with correct citations, and constructing complete evidence chains that link to the predicted answer. We further introduce Citation-aware Group Relative Policy Optimization (C-GRPO), which combines CaRR and outcome rewards for training robust deep search agents. Experiments show that C-GRPO consistently outperforms standard outcome-based RL baselines across multiple deep search benchmarks. Our analysis also validates that C-GRPO effectively discourages shortcut exploitation, promotes comprehensive, evidence-grounded reasoning, and exhibits strong generalization to open-ended deep research tasks. Our code and data are available at https://github.com/THUDM/CaRR.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 5fd687cf-8b63-410a-951d-204e3da54656Builds on12
- GAIA: a benchmark for General AI AssistantsGrégoire Mialon, Clémentine Fourrier, Thomas Wolf, Yann LeCun et al.ICLR 2024 · 716 citations
- Group-in-Group Policy Optimization for LLM Agent TrainingLang Feng, Zhenghai Xue, Tingcong Liu, Bo AnNeurIPS 2025 · 484 citations
- Rubrics as Rewards: Reinforcement Learning Beyond Verifiable DomainsAnisha Gunjal, Anthony Wang, Elaine Lau, Vaskar Nath et al.ICLR 2026 · 340 citations
- WebDancer: Towards Autonomous Information Seeking AgencyJialong Wu, Baixuan Li, Runnan Fang, Wenbiao Yin et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 194 citations
- Agentic Reinforced Policy OptimizationGuanting Dong, Hangyu Mao, Kai Ma, Licheng Bao et al.ICLR 2026 · 146 citations
Related papers
- Repurposing Synthetic Data for Fine-grained Search Agent SupervisionYida Zhao, Kuan Li, Xixi Wu, Liwen Zhang et al.ICLR 2026 · 9 citations
- Enhancing LLM-based Search Agents via Contribution Weighted Group Relative Policy OptimizationJunzhe Wang, Zhiheng Xi, Yajie Yang, Hao Luo et al.ACL 2026 · 4 citations
- QuRL: Rubrics As Judge For Open-Ended Question AnsweringXiyu Wei, Qingwei Zong, Xiaoguang Li, Eugene J. Yu et al.ICLR 2026
- Fathom-DeepResearch: Unlocking Long Horizon Information Retrieval and Synthesis for SLMsShreyas Singh, Kunal Singh, Pradeep MoturiICLR 2026 · 5 citations
- Breaking the Exploration Bottleneck: Rubric-Scaffolded Reinforcement Learning for Open-Ended LLM ReasoningYang Zhou, Sunzhu Li, Shunyu Liu, Wenkai Fang et al.ICML 2026 · 44 citations
