The Rise of the Citizen Developer: Assessing the Security Impact of Online App Generators
Marten Oltrogge, Erik Derr, Christian Stransky, Yasemin Acar, Sascha Fahl, Christian Rossow, Giancarlo Pellegrino, Sven Bugiel, Michael Backes
Abstract
Mobile apps are increasingly created using online application generators (OAGs) that automate app development, distribution, and maintenance. These tools significantly lower the level of technical skill that is required for app development, which makes them particularly appealing to citizen developers, i.e., developers with little or no software engineering background. However, as the pervasiveness of these tools increases, so does their overall influence on the mobile ecosystem's security, as security lapses by such generators affect thousands of generated apps. The security of such generated apps, as well as their impact on the security of the overall app ecosystem, has not yet been investigated. We present the first comprehensive classification of commonly used OAGs for Android and show how to fingerprint uniquely generated apps to link them back to their generator. We thereby quantify the market penetration of these OAGs based on a corpus of 2,291,898 free Android apps from Google Play and discover that at least 11.1% of these apps were created using OAGs. Using a combination of dynamic, static, and manual analysis, we find that the services' app generation model is based on boilerplate code that is prone to reconfiguration attacks in 7/13 analyzed OAGs. Moreover, we show that this boilerplate code includes well-known security issues such as code injection vulnerabilities and insecure WebViews. Given the tight coupling of generated apps with their services' backends, we further identify security issues in their infrastructure. Due to the blackbox development approach, citizen developers are unaware of these hidden problems that ultimately put the end-users sensitive data and privacy at risk and violate the user's trust assumption. A particular worrisome result of our study is that OAGs indeed have a significant amplification factor for those vulnerabilities, notably harming the health of the overall mobile app ecosystem.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 5fb35457-caf3-4ddb-9db8-008123c22870Cited by top-tier papers11
- Why Eve and Mallory Still Love Android: Revisiting TLS (In)Security in Android ApplicationsMarten Oltrogge, Nicolas Huaman, Sabrina Amft, Yasemin Acar et al.USENIX Security 2021 · 45 citations
- DreamCodeVR: Towards Democratizing Behavior Design in Virtual Reality with Speech-Driven ProgrammingDaniele Giunchi, Nels Numan, Elia Gatti, Anthony SteedIEEE VR 2024 · 43 citations
- How Did That Get In My Phone? Unwanted App Distribution on Android DevicesPlaton Kotzias, Juan Caballero, Leyla BilgeS&P 2021 · 37 citations
- Security Notifications in Static Analysis Tools: Developers' Attitudes, Comprehension, and Ability to Act on ThemMohammad Tahaei, Kami Vaniea, Konstantin Beznosov, Maria K. WoltersCHI 2021 · 35 citations
- Analyzing Ground-Truth Data of Mobile Gambling ScamsGeng Hong, Zhemin Yang, Sen Yang, Xiaojing Liao et al.S&P 2022 · 29 citations
Builds on5
- Reliable Third-Party Library Detection in Android and its Security ApplicationsMichael Backes, Sven Bugiel, Erik DerrCCS 2016 · 345 citations
- DROWN: Breaking TLS Using SSLv2Nimrod Aviram, Sebastian Schinzel, Juraj Somorovsky, Nadia Heninger et al.USENIX Security 2016 · 192 citations
- On Demystifying the Android Application Framework: Re-Visiting Android Permission Specification AnalysisMichael Backes, Sven Bugiel, Erik Derr, Patrick D. McDaniel et al.USENIX Security 2016 · 161 citations
- What Mobile Ads Know About Mobile UsersSooel Son, Daehyeok Kim, Vitaly ShmatikovNDSS 2016 · 101 citations
- SoK: Lessons Learned from Android Security Research for Appified Software PlatformsYasemin Acar, Michael Backes, Sven Bugiel, Sascha Fahl et al.S&P 2016 · 101 citations
Related papers
- Stack Overflow Considered Harmful? The Impact of Copy&Paste on Android Application SecurityFelix Fischer, Konstantin Böttinger, Huang Xiao, Christian Stransky et al.S&P 2017 · 293 citations
- You Get Where You're Looking for: The Impact of Information Sources on Code SecurityYasemin Acar, Michael Backes, Sascha Fahl, Doowon Kim et al.S&P 2016 · 325 citations
- Is It a Trap? A Large-scale Empirical Study And Comprehensive Assessment of Online Automated Privacy Policy Generators for Mobile AppsShidong Pan, Dawen Zhang, Mark Staples, Zhenchang Xing et al.USENIX Security 2024 · 18 citations
- Identifying Open-Source License Violation and 1-day Security Risk at Large ScaleRuian Duan, Ashish Bijlani, Meng Xu, Taesoo Kim et al.CCS 2017 · 126 citations
- Understanding Open Ports in Android Applications: Discovery, Diagnosis, and Security AssessmentDaoyuan Wu, Debin Gao, Rocky K. C. Chang, En He et al.NDSS 2019 · 25 citations
