Identifying Open-Source License Violation and 1-day Security Risk at Large Scale
Ruian Duan, Ashish Bijlani, Meng Xu, Taesoo Kim, Wenke Lee
Abstract
With millions of apps available to users, the mobile app market is rapidly becoming very crowded. Given the intense competition, the time to market is a critical factor for the success and profitability of an app. In order to shorten the development cycle, developers often focus their efforts on the unique features and workflows of their apps and rely on third-party Open Source Software (OSS) for the common features. Unfortunately, despite their benefits, careless use of OSS can introduce significant legal and security risks, which if ignored can not only jeopardize security and privacy of end users, but can also cause app developers high financial loss. However, tracking OSS components, their versions, and interdependencies can be very tedious and error-prone, particularly if an OSS is imported with little to no knowledge of its provenance. We therefore propose OSSPolice, a scalable and fully-automated tool for mobile app developers to quickly analyze their apps and identify free software license violations as well as usage of known vulnerable versions of OSS. OSSPolice introduces a novel hierarchical indexing scheme to achieve both high scalability and accuracy, and is capable of efficiently comparing similarities of app binaries against a database of hundreds of thousands of OSS sources (billions of lines of code). We populated OSSPolice with 60K C/C++ and 77K Java OSS sources and analyzed 1.6M free Google Play Store apps. Our results show that 1) over 40K apps potentially violate GPL/AGPL licensing terms, and 2) over 100K of apps use known vulnerable versions of OSS. Further analysis shows that developers violate GPL/AGPL licensing terms due to lack of alternatives, and use vulnerable versions of OSS despite efforts from companies like Google to improve app security. OSSPolice is available on GitHub.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers43
- CodeCMR: Cross-Modal Retrieval For Function-Level Binary Source Code MatchingZeping Yu, Wenxin Zheng, Jiaqi Wang, Qiyi Tang et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 93 citations
- ATVHUNTER: Reliable Version Detection of Third-Party Libraries for Vulnerability Identification in Android ApplicationsXian Zhan, Lingling Fan, Sen Chen, Feng Wu et al.ICSE 2021 · 85 citations
- CyberGym: Evaluating AI Agents' Real-World Cybersecurity Capabilities at ScaleZhun Wang, Tianneng Shi, Jingxuan He, Matthew Cai et al.ICLR 2026 · 83 citations
- Patch based vulnerability matching for binary programsYifei Xu, Zhengzi Xu, Bihuan Chen, Fu Song et al.ISSTA 2020 · 74 citations
- Towards Understanding Third-party Library Dependency in C/C++ EcosystemWei Tang, Zhengzi Xu, Chengwei Liu, Jiahui Wu et al.ASE 2022 · 64 citations
Builds on4
- Scalable Graph-based Bug Search for Firmware ImagesQian Feng, Rundong Zhou, Chengcheng Xu, Yao Cheng et al.CCS 2016 · 456 citations
- VUDDY: A Scalable Approach for Vulnerable Code Clone DiscoverySeulbae Kim, Seunghoon Woo, Heejo Lee, Hakjoo OhS&P 2017 · 388 citations
- Reliable Third-Party Library Detection in Android and its Security ApplicationsMichael Backes, Sven Bugiel, Erik DerrCCS 2016 · 345 citations
- discovRE: Efficient Cross-Architecture Identification of Bugs in Binary CodeSebastian Eschweiler, Khaled Yakdan, Elmar Gerhards-PadillaNDSS 2016 · 342 citations
Related papers
- OSSFP: Precise and Scalable C/C++ Third-Party Library Detection using Fingerprinting FunctionsJiahui Wu, Zhengzi Xu, Wei Tang, Lyuye Zhang et al.ICSE 2023 · 29 citations
- Stack Overflow Considered Harmful? The Impact of Copy&Paste on Android Application SecurityFelix Fischer, Konstantin Böttinger, Huang Xiao, Christian Stransky et al.S&P 2017 · 293 citations
- Automating Patching of Vulnerable Open-Source Software Versions in Application BinariesRuian Duan, Ashish Bijlani, Yang Ji, Omar Alrawi et al.NDSS 2019 · 63 citations
- Keep me Updated: An Empirical Study of Third-Party Library Updatability on AndroidErik Derr, Sven Bugiel, Sascha Fahl, Yasemin Acar et al.CCS 2017 · 196 citations
- LibScan: Towards More Precise Third-Party Library Identification for Android ApplicationsYafei Wu, Cong Sun, Dongrui Zeng, Gang Tan et al.USENIX Security 2023
