PEA-PODs: Perceptual Evaluation of Algorithms for Power Optimization in XR Displays
Kenneth Chen, Thomas Wan, Nathan Matsuda, Ajit Ninan, Alexandre Chapiro, Qi Sun
Abstract
Display power consumption is an emerging concern for untethered devices. This goes double for augmented and virtual extended reality (XR) displays, which target high refresh rates and high resolutions while conforming to an ergonomically light form factor. A number of image mapping techniques have been proposed to extend battery usage. However, there is currently no comprehensive quantitative understanding of how the power savings provided by these methods compare to their impact on visual quality. We set out to answer this question. To this end, we present a perceptual evaluation of algorithms (PEA) for power optimization in XR displays (PODs). Consolidating a portfolio of six power-saving display mapping approaches, we begin by performing a large-scale perceptual study to understand the impact of each method on perceived quality in the wild. This results in a unified quality score for each technique, scaled in just-objectionable-difference (JOD) units. In parallel, each technique is analyzed using hardware-accurate power models. The resulting JOD-to-Milliwatt transfer function provides a first-of-its-kind look into tradeoffs offered by display mapping techniques, and can be directly employed to make architectural decisions for power budgets on XR displays. Finally, we leverage our study data and power models to address important display power applications like the choice of display primary, power implications of eye tracking, and more 1 .
Ask about this paper
Ask your agent about it.
Lune has read the top-tier papers around this one, so every answer names the papers it rests on.
Your agent calls
Lunesearch_papers
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers get 5f73e97f-79e2-4fa8-a592-0e428ec4e3abCited by top-tier papers5
- MetaSapiens: Real-Time Neural Rendering with Efficiency-Aware Pruning and Accelerated Foveated RenderingWeikai Lin, Yu Feng, Yuhao ZhuASPLOS 2025 · 30 citations
- Process Only Where You Look: Hardware and Algorithm Co-optimization for Efficient Gaze-Tracked Foveated Rendering in Virtual RealityHaiyu Wang, Wenxuan Liu, Kenneth Chen, Qi Sun et al.ISCA 2025 · 6 citations
- What is HDR? Perceptual Impact of Luminance and Contrast in Immersive DisplaysKenneth Chen, Nathan Matsuda, Jon McElvain, Yang Zhao et al.SIGGRAPH 2025 · 4 citations
- Adapting Quality Metrics to Tone MappingKenneth Chen, Dongyeon Kim, Yuta Asano, Alexandre Chapiro et al.SIGGRAPH 2026
- Dichoptic FoveationHenry Kam, Colin Groth, Jenna Kang, Pratham Saraf et al.SIGGRAPH 2026
Related papers
- Power, Performance, and Image Quality Tradeoffs in Foveated RenderingRahul Singh, Muhammad Huzaifa, Jeffrey Liu, Anjul Patney et al.IEEE VR 2023 · 31 citations
- Exploring Pseudo-Weight in Augmented Reality Extended DisplaysShohei Mori, Yuta Kataoka, Satoshi HashiguchiIEEE VR 2022 · 9 citations
- Saccade-Contingent RenderingYuna Kwak, Eric Penner, Xuan Wang, Mohammad R. Saeedpour-Parizi et al.SIGGRAPH 2024 · 5 citations
- BOXR: Body and head motion Optimization framework for eXtended RealityZiliang Zhang, Zexin Li, Hyoseung Kim, Cong LiuRTSS 2024 · 4 citations
- AlphaPIG: The Nicest Way to Prolong Interactive Gestures in Extended RealityYi Li, Florian Fischer, Tim Dwyer, Barrett Ens et al.CHI 2025 · 15 citations
