Credal Self-Supervised Learning
Julian Lienen, Eyke Hüllermeier
Abstract
Self-training is an effective approach to semi-supervised learning. The key idea is to let the learner itself iteratively generate"pseudo-supervision"for unlabeled instances based on its current hypothesis. In combination with consistency regularization, pseudo-labeling has shown promising performance in various domains, for example in computer vision. To account for the hypothetical nature of the pseudo-labels, these are commonly provided in the form of probability distributions. Still, one may argue that even a probability distribution represents an excessive level of informedness, as it suggests that the learner precisely knows the ground-truth conditional probabilities. In our approach, we therefore allow the learner to label instances in the form of credal sets, that is, sets of (candidate) probability distributions. Thanks to this increased expressiveness, the learner is able to represent uncertainty and a lack of knowledge in a more flexible and more faithful manner. To learn from weakly labeled data of that kind, we leverage methods that have recently been proposed in the realm of so-called superset learning. In an exhaustive empirical evaluation, we compare our methodology to state-of-the-art self-supervision approaches, showing competitive to superior performance especially in low-label scenarios incorporating a high degree of uncertainty.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 5ee07e90-7e1f-4076-901f-00ec1873cef9Cited by top-tier papers3
- Credal Learning TheoryMichele Caprio, Maryam Sultana, Eleni Elia, Fabio CuzzolinNeurIPS 2024 · 34 citations
- Okapi: Generalising Better by Making Statistical Matches MatchMyles Bartlett, Sara Romiti, Viktoriia Sharmanska, Novi QuadriantoNeurIPS 2022 · 3 citations
- Efficient Credal Prediction through DecalibrationPaul Hofman, Timo Löhr, Maximilian Muschalik, Yusuf Sale et al.ICLR 2026 · 1 citation
Builds on20
- Bootstrap Your Own Latent - A New Approach to Self-Supervised LearningJean-Bastien Grill, Florian Strub, Florent Altché, Corentin Tallec et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 9,171 citations
- Emerging Properties in Self-Supervised Vision TransformersMathilde Caron, Hugo Touvron, Ishan Misra, Hervé Jégou et al.ICCV 2021 · 8,921 citations
- FixMatch: Simplifying Semi-Supervised Learning with Consistency and ConfidenceKihyuk Sohn, David Berthelot, Nicholas Carlini, Zizhao Zhang et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 5,129 citations
- RandAugment: Practical Automated Data Augmentation with a Reduced Search SpaceEkin Dogus Cubuk, Barret Zoph, Jonathon Shlens, Quoc LeNeurIPS 2020 · 4,453 citations
- Unsupervised Data Augmentation for Consistency TrainingQizhe Xie, Zihang Dai, Eduard H. Hovy, Thang Luong et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 2,774 citations
Related papers
- Conformalized Credal Set PredictorsAlireza Javanmardi, David Stutz, Eyke HüllermeierNeurIPS 2024 · 28 citations
- Learning with Partial Labels from Semi-supervised PerspectiveXiming Li, Yuanzhi Jiang, Changchun Li, Yiyuan Wang et al.AAAI 2023 · 22 citations
- LaSSL: Label-Guided Self-Training for Semi-supervised LearningZhen Zhao, Luping Zhou, Lei Wang, Yinghuan Shi et al.AAAI 2022 · 51 citations
- In Defense of Pseudo-Labeling: An Uncertainty-Aware Pseudo-label Selection Framework for Semi-Supervised LearningMamshad Nayeem Rizve, Kevin Duarte, Yogesh S. Rawat, Mubarak ShahICLR 2021 · 630 citations
- Curriculum Labeling: Revisiting Pseudo-Labeling for Semi-Supervised LearningPaola Cascante-Bonilla, Fuwen Tan, Yanjun Qi, Vicente OrdonezAAAI 2021 · 362 citations
