Efficient Credal Prediction through Decalibration
Paul Hofman, Timo Löhr, Maximilian Muschalik, Yusuf Sale, Eyke Hüllermeier
Abstract
A reliable representation of uncertainty is essential for the application of modern machine learning methods in safety-critical settings. In this regard, the use of credal sets (i.e., convex sets of probability distributions) has recently been proposed as a suitable approach to representing epistemic uncertainty. However, as with other approaches to epistemic uncertainty, training credal predictors is computationally complex and usually involves (re-)training an ensemble of models. The resulting computational complexity prevents their adoption for complex models such as foundation models and multi-modal systems. To address this problem, we propose an efficient method for credal prediction that is grounded in the notion of relative likelihood and inspired by techniques for the calibration of probabilistic classifiers. For each class label, our method predicts a range of plausible probabilities in the form of an interval. To produce the lower and upper bounds of these intervals, we propose a technique that we refer to as decalibration. Extensive experiments show that our method yields credal sets with strong performance across diverse tasks, including coverage-efficiency evaluation, out-of-distribution detection, and in-context learning. Notably, we demonstrate credal prediction on models such as TabPFN and CLIP -- architectures for which the construction of credal sets was previously infeasible.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 9addb19c-b524-4604-8597-f7d587a8e849Builds on26
- Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language SupervisionAlec Radford, Jong Wook Kim, Chris Hallacy, Aditya Ramesh et al.ICML 2021 · 47,906 citations
- Sigmoid Loss for Language Image Pre-TrainingXiaohua Zhai, Basil Mustafa, Alexander Kolesnikov, Lucas BeyerICCV 2023 · 2,932 citations
- Deep Evidential RegressionAlexander Amini, Wilko Schwarting, Ava Soleimany, Daniela RusNeurIPS 2020 · 777 citations
- Simple and Principled Uncertainty Estimation with Deterministic Deep Learning via Distance AwarenessJeremiah Z. Liu, Zi Lin, Shreyas Padhy, Dustin Tran et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 604 citations
- Uncertainty Estimation Using a Single Deep Deterministic Neural NetworkJoost van Amersfoort, Lewis Smith, Yee Whye Teh, Yarin GalICML 2020 · 529 citations
Related papers
- Credal Deep Ensembles for Uncertainty QuantificationKaizheng Wang, Fabio Cuzzolin, Shireen Kudukkil Manchingal, Keivan Shariatmadar et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 37 citations
- Credal Ensemble Distillation for Uncertainty QuantificationKaizheng Wang, Fabio Cuzzolin, David Moens, Hans HallezAAAI 2026
- Credal Wrapper of Model Averaging for Uncertainty Estimation in ClassificationKaizheng Wang, Fabio Cuzzolin, Keivan Shariatmadar, David Moens et al.ICLR 2025
- Conformalized Credal Set PredictorsAlireza Javanmardi, David Stutz, Eyke HüllermeierNeurIPS 2024 · 28 citations
- Credal Prediction based on Relative LikelihoodTimo Löhr, Paul Hofman, Felix Mohr, Eyke HüllermeierNeurIPS 2025 · 11 citations
