Transfer Learning In Differential Privacy's Hybrid-Model
Refael Kohen, Or Sheffet
Abstract
The hybrid-model (Avent et al 2017) in Differential Privacy is a an augmentation of the local-model where in addition to N local-agents we are assisted by one special agent who is in fact a curator holding the sensitive details of n additional individuals. Here we study the problem of machine learning in the hybrid-model where the n individuals in the curators dataset are drawn from a different distribution than the one of the general population (the local-agents). We give a general scheme -- Subsample-Test-Reweigh -- for this transfer learning problem, which reduces any curator-model DP-learner to a hybrid-model learner in this setting using iterative subsampling and reweighing of the n examples held by the curator based on a smooth variation of the Multiplicative-Weights algorithm (introduced by Bun et al, 2020). Our scheme has a sample complexity which relies on the chi-squared divergence between the two distributions. We give worst-case analysis bounds on the sample complexity required for our private reduction. Aiming to reduce said sample complexity, we give two specific instances our sample complexity can be drastically reduced (one instance is analyzed mathematically, while the other - empirically) and pose several directions for follow-up work.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 5e764392-bbe1-40f9-9703-cc1e6f5a0061Cited by top-tier papers2
- Private Distribution Learning with Public Data: The View from Sample CompressionShai Ben-David, Alex Bie, Clément L. Canonne, Gautam Kamath et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 18 citations
- MPC for Tech Giants (GMPC): Enabling Gulliver and the Lilliputians to Cooperate AmicablyBar Alon, Moni Naor, Eran Omri, Uri StemmerCRYPTO 2024 · 2 citations
Builds on7
- Is Interaction Necessary for Distributed Private Learning?Adam D. Smith, Abhradeep Thakurta, Jalaj UpadhyayS&P 2017 · 159 citations
- Differentially Private Meta-LearningJeffrey Li, Mikhail Khodak, Sebastian Caldas, Ameet TalwalkarICLR 2020 · 125 citations
- BLENDER: Enabling Local Search with a Hybrid Differential Privacy ModelBrendan Avent, Aleksandra Korolova, David Zeber, Torgeir Hovden et al.USENIX Security 2017 · 101 citations
- Subgaussian and Differentiable Importance Sampling for Off-Policy Evaluation and LearningAlberto Maria Metelli, Alessio Russo, Marcello RestelliNeurIPS 2021 · 55 citations
- Private Summation in the Multi-Message Shuffle ModelBorja Balle, James Bell, Adrià Gascón, Kobbi NissimCCS 2020 · 52 citations
Related papers
- Differentially Private Prototypes for Imbalanced Transfer LearningDariush Wahdany, Matthew Jagielski, Adam Dziedzic, Franziska BoenischAAAI 2025 · 4 citations
- It's My Data Too: Private ML for Datasets with Multi-User Training ExamplesArun Ganesh, Ryan McKenna, Hugh Brendan McMahan, Adam Smith et al.ICML 2025
- User-Level Differentially Private Learning via Correlated SamplingBadih Ghazi, Ravi Kumar, Pasin ManurangsiNeurIPS 2021 · 45 citations
- Unified Mechanism-Specific Amplification by Subsampling and Group Privacy AmplificationJan Schuchardt, Mihail Stoian, Arthur Kosmala, Stephan GünnemannNeurIPS 2024 · 8 citations
- INO-SGD: Addressing Utility Imbalance under Individualized Differential PrivacyXiao Tian, Jue Fan, Rachael Hwee Ling Sim, Bryan Kian Hsiang LowICLR 2026
