Hardness of Learning Neural Networks under the Manifold Hypothesis
Bobak T. Kiani, Jason Wang, Melanie Weber
Abstract
The manifold hypothesis presumes that high-dimensional data lies on or near a low-dimensional manifold. While the utility of encoding geometric structure has been demonstrated empirically, rigorous analysis of its impact on the learnability of neural networks is largely missing. Several recent results have established hardness results for learning feedforward and equivariant neural networks under i.i.d. Gaussian or uniform Boolean data distributions. In this paper, we investigate the hardness of learning under the manifold hypothesis. We ask which minimal assumptions on the curvature and regularity of the manifold, if any, render the learning problem efficiently learnable. We prove that learning is hard under input manifolds of bounded curvature by extending proofs of hardness in the SQ and cryptographic settings for Boolean data inputs to the geometric setting. On the other hand, we show that additional assumptions on the volume of the data manifold alleviate these fundamental limitations and guarantee learnability via a simple interpolation argument. Notable instances of this regime are manifolds which can be reliably reconstructed via manifold learning. Looking forward, we comment on and empirically explore intermediate regimes of manifolds, which have heterogeneous features commonly found in real world data.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 5e49e4f8-2dab-4136-aedb-9ebd4ef84883Cited by top-tier papers4
- Semantic Tube Prediction: Beating LLM Data Efficiency with JEPAHai Huang, Yann LeCun, Randall BalestrieroICML 2026 · 8 citations
- DeepWeightFlow: Re-Basined Flow Matching for Generating Neural Network WeightsSaumya Gupta, Scott Biggs, Moritz Laber, Zohair Shafi et al.ICLR 2026 · 5 citations
- The Data Manifold under the MicroscopeMarios Koulakis, Constantin SeiboldICML 2026
- Riemannian Metric Matching for Scalable Geometric Modeling of DistributionsJacob Bamberger, Adam Gosztolai, Pierre Vandergheynst, Michael Bronstein et al.ICML 2026
Builds on17
- Improved Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic ModelsAlexander Quinn Nichol, Prafulla DhariwalICML 2021 · 5,234 citations
- Hyperbolic Neural Networks++Ryohei Shimizu, Yusuke Mukuta, Tatsuya HaradaICLR 2021 · 791 citations
- The Intrinsic Dimension of Images and Its Impact on LearningPhillip Pope, Chen Zhu, Ahmed Abdelkader, Micah Goldblum et al.ICLR 2021 · 381 citations
- A Universal Law of Robustness via IsoperimetrySébastien Bubeck, Mark SellkeNeurIPS 2021 · 260 citations
- Score Approximation, Estimation and Distribution Recovery of Diffusion Models on Low-Dimensional DataMinshuo Chen, Kaixuan Huang, Tuo Zhao, Mengdi WangICML 2023 · 168 citations
Related papers
- Blessing of Dimensionality for Approximating Sobolev Classes on ManifoldsHong Ye Tan, Subhadip Mukherjee, Junqi Tang, Carola-Bibiane SchönliebAAAI 2026
- On Deep Generative Models for Approximation and Estimation of Distributions on ManifoldsBiraj Dahal, Alexander Havrilla, Minshuo Chen, Tuo Zhao et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 17 citations
- Besov Function Approximation and Binary Classification on Low-Dimensional Manifolds Using Convolutional Residual NetworksHao Liu, Minshuo Chen, Tuo Zhao, Wenjing LiaoICML 2021 · 42 citations
- On the non-universality of deep learning: quantifying the cost of symmetryEmmanuel Abbe, Enric Boix-AdseràNeurIPS 2022 · 24 citations
- Feature Learning beyond the Lazy-Rich Dichotomy: Insights from Representational GeometryChi-Ning Chou, Hang Le, Yichen Wang, SueYeon ChungICML 2025
