Lune

ACL2026Top-tier venue

TEA-Bench: A Systematic Benchmarking of Tool-enhanced Emotional Support Dialogue Agent

Xingyu Sui, Yanyan Zhao, Yulin Hu, Jiahe Guo, Weixiang Zhao, Bing Qin

2026Year
3Citations
1Top-tier citations

Abstract

Emotional Support Conversation requires not only affective expression but also grounded instrumental support to provide trustworthy guidance. However, existing ESC systems and benchmarks largely focus on affective support in text-only settings, overlooking how external tools can enable factual grounding and reduce hallucination in multi-turn emotional support. We introduce TEA-Bench, the first interactive benchmark for evaluating tool-augmented agents in ESC, featuring realistic emotional scenarios, an MCP-style tool environment, and process-level metrics that jointly assess the quality and factual grounding of emotional support. Experiments on nine LLMs show that tool augmentation generally improves emotional support quality and reduces hallucination, but the gains are strongly capacity-dependent: stronger models use tools more selectively and effectively, while weaker models benefit only marginally. We further release TEA-Dialog, a dataset of tool-enhanced ESC dialogues, and find that supervised fine-tuning improves indistribution support but generalizes poorly. Our results underscore the importance of tool use in building reliable emotional support agents. 1 * Corresponding author 1 Our code and data can be found in https://github. com/XingYuSSS/TEA-Bench .

Ask about this paper

Your agent reads all of it.

Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.

Questions to start from

Your agent calls

Luneget_paper_fulltext

Ask in Lune

Free to start. No credit card required.

lune papers fulltext 5df009a6-719f-47b7-a27b-3075f40ee0b8

Cited by top-tier papers1

Ask how each one uses it

Builds on8

Related papers

Dusk over the sea between two cliffs drawn in fine vertical lines