Rediscovering Method Confusion in Proposed Security Fixes for Bluetooth
Maximilian von Tschirschnitz, Ludwig Peuckert, Moritz Buhl, Jens Grossklags
Abstract
—Previous works have shown that Bluetooth is susceptible to so-called Method Confusion attacks. These attacks manipulate devices into conducting conflicting key establishment methods, leading to compromised keys. An increasing amount of security-sensitive applications, like payment terminals, organizational asset tracking systems and conferencing technologies now rely on the availability of a technology like Bluetooth. It is thus an urgent goal to find and validate a mitigation to these attacks or to provide an appropriate replacement for Bluetooth without introducing additional requirements that exclude device or user groups. Despite recent solution proposals, existing threat models overlook certain attack vectors or dismiss important scenarios and consequently suffer under new variants of Method Confusion. Wefirstpropose an extended threat model that appreciates the root issue of Method Confusion and also considers multiple pairing attempts and one-sided pairings as security risks. Evaluating existing solution proposals with our threat model, we are able to detect known Method Confusion attacks, and identify new vulnerabilities in previous solution proposals. We demonstrate the viability of these attacks on real-world Bluetooth devices. We further discuss a novel solution approach offering enhanced security, while maintaining compatibility with existing hardware and Bluetooth user behavior. We conduct a formal security proof of our proposal and implement it on commonplace Bluetooth hardware, positioning it as the currently most promising update proposal for Bluetooth.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 5de2f797-6dfb-4a33-9201-f58fe45dee4dBuilds on7
- Method Confusion Attack on Bluetooth PairingMaximilian von Tschirschnitz, Ludwig Peuckert, Fabian Franzen, Jens GrossklagsS&P 2021 · 42 citations
- Formal Model-Driven Discovery of Bluetooth Protocol Design VulnerabilitiesJianliang Wu, Ruoyu Wu, Dongyan Xu, Dave Jing Tian et al.S&P 2022 · 36 citations
- BlueSWAT: A Lightweight State-Aware Security Framework for Bluetooth Low EnergyXijia Che, Yi He, Xuewei Feng, Kun Sun et al.CCS 2024 · 10 citations
- Fake It till You Make It: Enhancing Security of Bluetooth Secure Connections via Deferrable AuthenticationMarc Fischlin, Olga SaninaCCS 2024 · 2 citations
- The Bluetooth CYBORG: Analysis of the Full Human-Machine Passkey Entry AKE ProtocolMichael Troncoso, Britta HaleNDSS 2021
Related papers
- BLUFFS: Bluetooth Forward and Future Secrecy Attacks and DefensesDaniele AntonioliCCS 2023 · 7 citations
- BIAS: Bluetooth Impersonation AttackSDaniele Antonioli, Nils Ole Tippenhauer, Kasper RasmussenS&P 2020 · 90 citations
- BadBluetooth: Breaking Android Security Mechanisms via Malicious Bluetooth PeripheralsFenghao Xu, Wenrui Diao, Zhou Li, Jiongyi Chen et al.NDSS 2019 · 51 citations
- Extrapolating Formal Analysis to Uncover Attacks in Bluetooth Passkey Entry PairingMohit Kumar Jangid, Yue Zhang, Zhiqiang LinNDSS 2023
- BLERP: BLE Re-Pairing Attacks and DefensesTommaso Sacchetti, Daniele AntonioliNDSS 2026 · 2 citations
