An Exponential Lower Bound for Linearly Realizable MDP with Constant Suboptimality Gap
Yuanhao Wang, Ruosong Wang, Sham M. Kakade
Abstract
A fundamental question in the theory of reinforcement learning is: suppose the optimal -function lies in the linear span of a given dimensional feature mapping, is sample-efficient reinforcement learning (RL) possible? The recent and remarkable result of Weisz et al. (2020) resolved this question in the negative, providing an exponential (in ) sample size lower bound, which holds even if the agent has access to a generative model of the environment. One may hope that this information theoretic barrier for RL can be circumvented by further supposing an even more favorable assumption: there exists a constant suboptimality gap between the optimal -value of the best action and that of the second-best action (for all states). The hope is that having a large suboptimality gap would permit easier identification of optimal actions themselves, thus making the problem tractable; indeed, provided the agent has access to a generative model, sample-efficient RL is in fact possible with the addition of this more favorable assumption. This work focuses on this question in the standard online reinforcement learning setting, where our main result resolves this question in the negative: our hardness result shows that an exponential sample complexity lower bound still holds even if a constant suboptimality gap is assumed in addition to having a linearly realizable optimal -function. Perhaps surprisingly, this implies an exponential separation between the online RL setting and the generative model setting. Complementing our negative hardness result, we give two positive results showing that provably sample-efficient RL is possible either under an additional low-variance assumption or under a novel hypercontractivity assumption (both implicitly place stronger conditions on the underlying dynamics model).
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 5dcfe538-1c00-4336-8cb6-a8c73edf45e1Cited by top-tier papers8
- The Benefits of Being Distributional: Small-Loss Bounds for Reinforcement LearningKaiwen Wang, Kevin Zhou, Runzhe Wu, Nathan Kallus et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 31 citations
- Q#: Provably Optimal Distributional RL for LLM Post-TrainingJin Peng Zhou, Kaiwen Wang, Jonathan D. Chang, Zhaolin Gao et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 18 citations
- Free from Bellman Completeness: Trajectory Stitching via Model-based Return-conditioned Supervised LearningZhaoyi Zhou, Chuning Zhu, Runlong Zhou, Qiwen Cui et al.ICLR 2024 · 13 citations
- Computationally Efficient PAC RL in POMDPs with Latent Determinism and Conditional EmbeddingsMasatoshi Uehara, Ayush Sekhari, Jason D. Lee, Nathan Kallus et al.ICML 2023 · 9 citations
- What can online reinforcement learning with function approximation benefit from general coverage conditions?Fanghui Liu, Luca Viano, Volkan CevherICML 2023 · 6 citations
Builds on18
- Model-Based Reinforcement Learning with Value-Targeted RegressionAlex Ayoub, Zeyu Jia, Csaba Szepesvári, Mengdi Wang et al.ICML 2020 · 324 citations
- Reinforcement Learning in Feature Space: Matrix Bandit, Kernels, and Regret BoundLin Yang, Mengdi WangICML 2020 · 308 citations
- Provably Efficient Exploration in Policy OptimizationQi Cai, Zhuoran Yang, Chi Jin, Zhaoran WangICML 2020 · 304 citations
- Beyond UCB: Optimal and Efficient Contextual Bandits with Regression OraclesDylan J. Foster, Alexander RakhlinICML 2020 · 241 citations
- Learning Near Optimal Policies with Low Inherent Bellman ErrorAndrea Zanette, Alessandro Lazaric, Mykel J. Kochenderfer, Emma BrunskillICML 2020 · 238 citations
Related papers
- Sample-Efficient Reinforcement Learning Is Feasible for Linearly Realizable MDPs with Limited RevisitingGen Li, Yuxin Chen, Yuejie Chi, Yuantao Gu et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 34 citations
- On Gap-dependent Bounds for Offline Reinforcement LearningXinqi Wang, Qiwen Cui, Simon S. DuNeurIPS 2022 · 19 citations
- Misspecified Q-Learning with Sparse Linear Function Approximation: Tight Bounds on Approximation ErrorAlly Yalei Du, Lin Yang, Ruosong WangICLR 2025
- Computational Hardness of Reinforcement Learning with Partial qπ-RealizabilityShayan Karimi, Xiaoqi TanNeurIPS 2025
- Optimism in Reinforcement Learning with Generalized Linear Function ApproximationYining Wang, Ruosong Wang, Simon Shaolei Du, Akshay KrishnamurthyICLR 2021 · 54 citations
