Catastrophic Failure of LLM Unlearning via Quantization
Zhiwei Zhang, Fali Wang, Xiaomin Li, Zongyu Wu, Xianfeng Tang, Hui Liu, Qi He, Wenpeng Yin, Suhang Wang
Abstract
Large language models (LLMs) have shown remarkable proficiency in generating text, benefiting from extensive training on vast textual corpora. However, LLMs may also acquire unwanted behaviors from the diverse and sensitive nature of their training data, which can include copyrighted and private content. Machine unlearning has been introduced as a viable solution to remove the influence of such problematic content without the need for costly and time-consuming retraining. This process aims to erase specific knowledge from LLMs while preserving as much model utility as possible. Despite the effectiveness of current unlearning methods, little attention has been given to whether existing unlearning methods for LLMs truly achieve forgetting or merely hide the knowledge, which current unlearning benchmarks fail to detect. This paper reveals that applying quantization to models that have undergone unlearning can restore the "forgotten" information. We conduct comprehensive experiments using various quantization techniques across multiple precision levels to thoroughly evaluate this phenomenon. We find that for unlearning methods with utility constraints, the unlearned model retains an average of 21% of the intended forgotten knowledge in full precision, which significantly increases to 83% after 4-bit quantization. Based on our empirical findings, we provide a theoretical explanation for the observed phenomenon and propose a quantization-robust unlearning strategy aimed at mitigating this intricate issue. Our results highlight a fundamental tension between preserving the utility of the unlearned model and preventing knowledge recovery through quantization, emphasizing the challenge of balancing these two objectives. Altogether, our study underscores a major failure in existing unlearning methods for LLMs, strongly advocating for more comprehensive and robust strategies to ensure authentic unlearning without compromising model utility. Our code is available at: https://github.com/zzwjames/FailureLLMUnlearning .
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 5d7b2161-5d31-415e-a016-c3b2817a43cfCited by top-tier papers19
- The Attacker Moves Second: Stronger Adaptive Attacks Bypass Defenses Against LLM Jailbreaks and Prompt InjectionsMilad Nasr, Nicholas Carlini, Chawin Sitawarin, Sander V. Schulhoff et al.USENIX Security 2026 · 134 citations
- AgentTTS: Large Language Model Agent for Test-time Compute-optimal Scaling Strategy in Complex TasksFali Wang, Hui Liu, Zhenwei Dai, Jingying Zeng et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 20 citations
- From Dormant to Deleted: Tamper-Resistant Unlearning Through Weight-Space RegularizationShoaib Ahmed Siddiqui, Adrian Weller, David Krueger, Gintare Karolina Dziugaite et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 16 citations
- Distillation Robustifies UnlearningBruce W. Lee, Addie Foote, Alex Infanger, Leni Shor et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 15 citations
- Unlocking the Power of Multi-Agent LLM for Reasoning: From Lazy Agents to DeliberationZhiwei Zhang, Xiaomin Li, Yudi Lin, Hui Liu et al.ICLR 2026 · 13 citations
Builds on31
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 citations
- Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward ModelRafael Rafailov, Archit Sharma, Eric Mitchell, Christopher D. Manning et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 10,924 citations
- Measuring Massive Multitask Language UnderstandingDan Hendrycks, Collin Burns, Steven Basart, Andy Zou et al.ICLR 2021 · 7,905 citations
- QLoRA: Efficient Finetuning of Quantized LLMsTim Dettmers, Artidoro Pagnoni, Ari Holtzman, Luke ZettlemoyerNeurIPS 2023 · 5,863 citations
- Locating and Editing Factual Associations in GPTKevin Meng, David Bau, Alex Andonian, Yonatan BelinkovNeurIPS 2022 · 3,415 citations
Related papers
- Forget to Know, Remember to Use: Context-Aware Unlearning for Large Language ModelsYuefeng Peng, Parnian Afshar, Megan Ganji, Thomas Butler et al.ICML 2026 · 1 citation
- Towards Effective Evaluations and Comparisons for LLM Unlearning MethodsQizhou Wang, Bo Han, Puning Yang, Jianing Zhu et al.ICLR 2025
- ZeroUnlearn: Few-Shot Knowledge Unlearning in Large Language ModelsYujie Lin, Chengyi Yang, Zhishang Xiang, YIPING SONG et al.ICML 2026
- Unlearning Isn't Invisible: Detecting Unlearning Traces in LLMs from Model OutputsYiwei Chen, Soumyadeep Pal, Yimeng Zhang, Qing Qu et al.ICLR 2026 · 15 citations
- WaterDrum: Watermark-based Data-centric Unlearning MetricXinyang Lu, Xinyuan Niu, Gregory Kang Ruey Lau, Nhung Bui et al.ICLR 2026 · 8 citations
