Reasoning Quality Emerges Early: Data Curation for Reasoning Models
Hongyi Jin, Wenhan Yang, Meysam Ghaffari, Carlos Morato, Baharan Mirzasoleiman
Abstract
Supervised fine-tuning (SFT) on a small, highquality set of long reasoning traces is an effective approach for eliciting strong reasoning capabilities in Large Language Models (LLMs). However, existing methods for curating high-quality SFT data rely heavily on strong reasoning models to filter examples based on diversity and difficulty, making the curation process costly while often yielding suboptimal data quality. In this work, we show that diverse and challenging reasoning examples can be identified using only the initial reasoning tokens. Specifically, we demonstrate that difficult problems can be reliably detected based on the loss of the first 100 reasoning tokens evaluated at a randomly perturbed checkpoint of the pretrained model. We further show that examples exhibiting similar loss patterns over their first 1k reasoning tokens across a small number of perturbed checkpoints extrapolating along the fine-tuning trajectory provably induce similar gradients. We validate our approach through extensive experiments on fine-tuning Qwen2.5-7B and Llama3.1-8B models on the M23K medical reasoning and OpenThoughts-Math datasets. Our method outperforms existing baselines by up to 1.7% while being 91% more token efficient. 1 Recent large language models, such as DeepSeek-R1 (Guo et al., 2025) and o3 (OpenAI, 2024), exhibit strong performance on reasoning-intensive benchmarks spanning mathematics, programming, and scientific domains. These capabilities are induced through post-training a strong
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 5d38f25f-193e-4889-825c-1b61ddef4f51Builds on16
- Let's Verify Step by StepHunter Lightman, Vineet Kosaraju, Yuri Burda, Harrison Edwards et al.ICLR 2024 · 3,045 citations
- What Makes Good Data for Alignment? A Comprehensive Study of Automatic Data Selection in Instruction TuningWei Liu, Weihao Zeng, Keqing He, Yong Jiang et al.ICLR 2024 · 369 citations
- AlpaGasus: Training a Better Alpaca with Fewer DataLichang Chen, Shiyang Li, Jun Yan, Hai Wang et al.ICLR 2024 · 295 citations
- Deep learning versus kernel learning: an empirical study of loss landscape geometry and the time evolution of the Neural Tangent KernelStanislav Fort, Gintare Karolina Dziugaite, Mansheej Paul, Sepideh Kharaghani et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 255 citations
- d1: Scaling Reasoning in Diffusion Large Language Models via Reinforcement LearningSiyan Zhao, Devaansh Gupta, Qinqing Zheng, Aditya GroverNeurIPS 2025 · 191 citations
Related papers
- OctoMed: Data Recipes for State-of-the-Art Multimodal Medical ReasoningTimothy Ossowski, Sheng Zhang, Qianchu Liu, Guanghui Qin et al.CVPR 2026 · 10 citations
- The First Few Tokens Are All You Need: An Efficient and Effective Unsupervised Prefix Fine-Tuning Method for Reasoning ModelsKe Ji, Jiahao Xu, Tian Liang, Qiuzhi Liu et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 33 citations
- Tailored Primitive Initialization is the Secret Key to Reinforcement LearningYihang Yao, Guangtao Zeng, Raina Wu, Yang Zhang et al.ACL 2026 · 1 citation
- Quagmires in SFT-RL Post-Training: When High SFT Scores Mislead and What to Use InsteadFeiyang Kang, Michael Kuchnik, Karthik Padthe, Marin Vlastelica et al.ICLR 2026 · 27 citations
- TokenSqueeze: Performance-Preserving Compression for Reasoning LLMsYuxiang Zhang, Zhengxu Yu, Weihang Pan, Zhongming Jin et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 6 citations
