Error Analysis Affected by Heavy-Tailed Gradients for Non-Convex Pairwise Stochastic Gradient Descent
Jun Chen, Hong Chen, Bin Gu, Guodong Liu, Yingjie Wang, Weifu Li
Abstract
In recent years, there have been a growing number of works studying the generalization properties of stochastic gradient descent (SGD) from the perspective of algorithmic stability. However, few of them devote to simultaneously studying the generalization and optimization for the non-convex setting, especially pairwise SGD with heavy-tailed gradient noise. This paper considers the impact of the heavy-tailed gradient noise obeying sub-Weibull distribution on the stability-based learning guarantees for non-convex pairwise SGD by investigating its generalization and optimization jointly. Specifically, based on two novel pairwise uniform model stability tools, we firstly bound the generalization error of pairwise SGD in the general non-convex setting after bridging the quantitative relationships between stability and generalization error. Then, we further consider the practical heavy-tailed sub-Weibull gradient noise condition to establish a refined generalization bound without the bounded gradient condition. Finally, sharper error bounds for generalization and optimization are built by introducing the gradient dominance condition. Comparing these results reveals that sub-Weibull gradient noise brings some positive dependencies on the heavy-tailed strength for generalization and optimization. Furthermore, we extend our analysis to the corresponding pairwise minibatch SGD and derive the first stability-based near-optimal generalization and optimization bounds which are consistent with many empirical observations.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 5d1afa4a-df04-4d2e-98fa-795a8029b81eCited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on16
- Why Gradient Clipping Accelerates Training: A Theoretical Justification for AdaptivityJingzhao Zhang, Tianxing He, Suvrit Sra, Ali JadbabaieICLR 2020 · 598 citations
- Don't Use Large Mini-batches, Use Local SGDTao Lin, Sebastian U. Stich, Kumar Kshitij Patel, Martin JaggiICLR 2020 · 462 citations
- Why are Adaptive Methods Good for Attention Models?Jingzhao Zhang, Sai Praneeth Karimireddy, Andreas Veit, Seungyeon Kim et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 397 citations
- Towards Theoretically Understanding Why Sgd Generalizes Better Than Adam in Deep LearningPan Zhou, Jiashi Feng, Chao Ma, Caiming Xiong et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 309 citations
- Minibatch vs Local SGD for Heterogeneous Distributed LearningBlake E. Woodworth, Kumar Kshitij Patel, Nati SrebroNeurIPS 2020 · 231 citations
Related papers
- High Probability Guarantees for Nonconvex Stochastic Gradient Descent with Heavy TailsShaojie Li, Yong LiuICML 2022 · 37 citations
- Stability and Generalization of Nonconvex Optimization with Heavy-Tailed NoiseHongxu Chen, Ke Wei, Xiaoming Yuan, Luo LuoICML 2026
- Algorithmic Stability of Heavy-Tailed SGD with General Loss FunctionsAnant Raj, Lingjiong Zhu, Mert Gürbüzbalaban, Umut SimsekliICML 2023 · 21 citations
- Robustness Analysis of Non-Convex Stochastic Gradient Descent using Biased ExpectationsKevin Scaman, Cédric MalherbeNeurIPS 2020 · 37 citations
- Generalization Guarantee of SGD for Pairwise LearningYunwen Lei, Mingrui Liu, Yiming YingNeurIPS 2021 · 37 citations
