Right for the Right Concept: Revising Neuro-Symbolic Concepts by Interacting With Their Explanations
Wolfgang Stammer, Patrick Schramowski, Kristian Kersting
Abstract
Most explanation methods in deep learning map importance estimates for a model's prediction back to the original input space. These "visual" explanations are often insufficient, as the model's actual concept remains elusive. Moreover, without insights into the model's semantic concept, it is difficult -if not impossible-to intervene on the model's behavior via its explanations, called Explanatory Interactive Learning. Consequently, we propose to intervene on a Neuro-Symbolic scene representation, which allows one to revise the model on the semantic level, e.g. "never focus on the color to make your decision". We compiled a novel confounded visual scene data set, the CLEVR-Hans data set, capturing complex compositions of different objects. The results of our experiments on CLEVR-Hans demonstrate that our semantic explanations, i.e. compositional explanations at a per-object level, can identify confounders that are not identifiable using "visual" explanations only. More importantly, feedback on this semantic level makes it possible to revise the model from focusing on these factors.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 5b131b00-e371-47c3-b3c9-c4a11d7e224eCited by top-tier papers29
- Interpretable and Explainable Logical Policies via Neurally Guided Symbolic AbstractionQuentin Delfosse, Hikaru Shindo, Devendra Singh Dhami, Kristian KerstingNeurIPS 2023 · 64 citations
- Tell me why! Explanations support learning relational and causal structureAndrew K. Lampinen, Nicholas A. Roy, Ishita Dasgupta, Stephanie C. Y. Chan et al.ICML 2022 · 51 citations
- A Rationale-Centric Framework for Human-in-the-loop Machine LearningJinghui Lu, Linyi Yang, Brian MacNamee, Yue ZhangACL 2022 · 46 citations
- Post-hoc Concept Bottleneck ModelsMert Yüksekgönül, Maggie Wang, James ZouICLR 2023 · 37 citations
- Neuro-Symbolic Continual Learning: Knowledge, Reasoning Shortcuts and Concept RehearsalEmanuele Marconato, Gianpaolo Bontempo, Elisa Ficarra, Simone Calderara et al.ICML 2023 · 34 citations
Builds on8
- Object-Centric Learning with Slot AttentionFrancesco Locatello, Dirk Weissenborn, Thomas Unterthiner, Aravindh Mahendran et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 1,275 citations
- Concept Bottleneck ModelsPang Wei Koh, Thao Nguyen, Yew Siang Tang, Stephen Mussmann et al.ICML 2020 · 1,233 citations
- Taking a HINT: Leveraging Explanations to Make Vision and Language Models More GroundedRamprasaath Ramasamy Selvaraju, Stefan Lee, Yilin Shen, Hongxia Jin et al.ICCV 2019 · 288 citations
- Interpretations are Useful: Penalizing Explanations to Align Neural Networks with Prior KnowledgeLaura Rieger, Chandan Singh, W. James Murdoch, Bin YuICML 2020 · 249 citations
- Restricting the Flow: Information Bottlenecks for AttributionKarl Schulz, Leon Sixt, Federico Tombari, Tim LandgrafICLR 2020 · 220 citations
Related papers
- ConceptExplainer: Interactive Explanation for Deep Neural Networks from a Concept PerspectiveJinbin Huang, Aditi Mishra, Bum Chul Kwon, Chris BryanIEEE VIS 2022 · 46 citations
- FunnyBirds: A Synthetic Vision Dataset for a Part-Based Analysis of Explainable AI MethodsRobin Hesse, Simone Schaub-Meyer, Stefan RothICCV 2023 · 50 citations
- Overlooked Factors in Concept-Based Explanations: Dataset Choice, Concept Learnability, and Human CapabilityVikram V. Ramaswamy, Sunnie S. Y. Kim, Ruth Fong, Olga RussakovskyCVPR 2023
- Compositional Explanations of NeuronsJesse Mu, Jacob AndreasNeurIPS 2020 · 229 citations
- Interpretable Visual Reasoning via Induced Symbolic SpaceZhonghao Wang, Kai Wang, Mo Yu, Jinjun Xiong et al.ICCV 2021 · 22 citations
