Post-hoc Concept Bottleneck Models
Mert Yüksekgönül, Maggie Wang, James Zou
Abstract
Concept Bottleneck Models (CBMs) map the inputs onto a set of interpretable concepts ("the bottleneck") and use the concepts to make predictions. A concept bottleneck enhances interpretability since it can be investigated to understand what concepts the model "sees" in an input and which of these concepts are deemed important. However, CBMs are restrictive in practice as they require dense concept annotations in the training data to learn the bottleneck. Moreover, CBMs often do not match the accuracy of an unrestricted neural network, reducing the incentive to deploy them in practice. In this work, we address these limitations of CBMs by introducing Post-hoc Concept Bottleneck models (PCBMs). We show that we can turn any neural network into a PCBM without sacrificing model performance while still retaining the interpretability benefits. When concept annotations are not available on the training data, we show that PCBM can transfer concepts from other datasets or from natural language descriptions of concepts via multimodal models. A key benefit of PCBM is that it enables users to quickly debug and update the model to reduce spurious correlations and improve generalization to new distributions. PCBM allows for global model edits, which can be more efficient than previous works on local interventions that fix a specific prediction. Through a model-editing user study, we show that editing PCBMs via conceptlevel feedback can provide significant performance gains without using data from the target domain or model retraining. The code for our paper can be found in https://github.com/mertyg/post-hoc-cbm .
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 25e10d8c-bc84-470f-8a8c-df8bfdbf1c4eCited by top-tier papers118
- Interpreting CLIP with Sparse Linear Concept Embeddings (SpLiCE)Usha Bhalla, Alex Oesterling, Suraj Srinivas, Flávio P. Calmon et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 146 citations
- Probabilistic Concept Bottleneck ModelsEunji Kim, Dahuin Jung, Sangha Park, Siwon Kim et al.ICML 2023 · 108 citations
- Discover and Cure: Concept-aware Mitigation of Spurious CorrelationShirley Wu, Mert Yüksekgönül, Linjun Zhang, James ZouICML 2023 · 97 citations
- Learning Concise and Descriptive Attributes for Visual RecognitionAn Yan, Yu Wang, Yiwu Zhong, Chengyu Dong et al.ICCV 2023 · 94 citations
- VLG-CBM: Training Concept Bottleneck Models with Vision-Language GuidanceDivyansh Srivastava, Ge Yan, Lily WengNeurIPS 2024 · 87 citations
Builds on16
- Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language SupervisionAlec Radford, Jong Wook Kim, Chris Hallacy, Aditya Ramesh et al.ICML 2021 · 47,906 citations
- Concept Bottleneck ModelsPang Wei Koh, Thao Nguyen, Yew Siang Tang, Stephen Mussmann et al.ICML 2020 · 1,233 citations
- Fast Model Editing at ScaleEric Mitchell, Charles Lin, Antoine Bosselut, Chelsea Finn et al.ICLR 2022 · 527 citations
- On Completeness-aware Concept-Based Explanations in Deep Neural NetworksChih-Kuan Yeh, Been Kim, Sercan Ömer Arik, Chun-Liang Li et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 390 citations
- Editable Neural NetworksAnton Sinitsin, Vsevolod Plokhotnyuk, Dmitry V. Pyrkin, Sergei Popov et al.ICLR 2020 · 210 citations
Related papers
- Label-free Concept Bottleneck ModelsTuomas P. Oikarinen, Subhro Das, Lam M. Nguyen, Tsui-Wei WengICLR 2023 · 17 citations
- Intervening in Black Box: Concept Bottleneck Model for Enhancing Human Neural Network Mutual UnderstandingNuoye Xiong, Anqi Dong, Ning Wang, Cong Hua et al.ICCV 2025 · 1 citation
- Debugging Concept Bottleneck Models through Removal and RetrainingEric Enouen, Sainyam GalhotraICLR 2026 · 2 citations
- Addressing Leakage in Concept Bottleneck ModelsMarton Havasi, Sonali Parbhoo, Finale Doshi-VelezNeurIPS 2022 · 163 citations
- Learning to Intervene on Concept BottlenecksDavid Steinmann, Wolfgang Stammer, Felix Friedrich, Kristian KerstingICML 2024 · 32 citations
