Unraveling the Interplay between Carryover Effects and Reward Autocorrelations in Switchback Experiments
Qianglin Wen, Chengchun Shi, Ying Yang, Niansheng Tang, Hongtu Zhu
Abstract
A/B testing has become the gold standard for policy evaluation in modern technological industries. Motivated by the widespread use of switchback experiments in A/B testing, this paper conducts a comprehensive comparative analysis of various switchback designs in Markovian environments. Unlike many existing works which derive the optimal design based on specific and relatively simple estimators, our analysis covers a range of state-ofthe-art estimators developed in the reinforcement learning (RL) literature. It reveals that the effectiveness of different switchback designs depends crucially on (i) the size of the carryover effect and (ii) the auto-correlations among reward errors over time. Meanwhile, these findings are estimator-agnostic, i.e., they apply to most RL estimators. Based on these insights, we provide a workflow to offer guidelines for practitioners on designing switchback experiments in A/B testing.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 5a3b6ca9-9b23-43e6-aa69-0c2ab0e066bcCited by top-tier papers5
- Pessimistic Data Integration for Policy EvaluationXiangkun Wu, Ting Li, Gholamali Aminian, Armin Behnamnia et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 2 citations
- Designing Time Series Experiments in A/B Testing with Transformer Reinforcement LearningXiangkun Wu, Qianglin Wen, Yingying Zhang, Hongtu Zhu et al.ICLR 2026 · 1 citation
- Demystifying the Paradox of Importance Sampling with an Estimated History-Dependent Behavior Policy in Off-Policy EvaluationHongyi Zhou, Josiah P. Hanna, Jin Zhu, Ying Yang et al.ICML 2025
- Balancing Interference and Correlation in Spatial Experimental Designs: A Causal Graph Cut ApproachJin Zhu, Jingyi Li, Hongyi Zhou, Yinan Lin et al.ICML 2025
- Robust Sequential Experimental Design for A/B TestingQianglin Wen, Xiangkun Wu, Chengchun Shi, Ting Li et al.ICML 2026
Builds on18
- Minimax Weight and Q-Function Learning for Off-Policy EvaluationMasatoshi Uehara, Jiawei Huang, Nan JiangICML 2020 · 199 citations
- Deep Adaptive Design: Amortizing Sequential Bayesian Experimental DesignAdam Foster, Desi R. Ivanova, Ilyas Malik, Tom RainforthICML 2021 · 119 citations
- CoinDICE: Off-Policy Confidence Interval EstimationBo Dai, Ofir Nachum, Yinlam Chow, Lihong Li et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 96 citations
- Optimizing Sequential Experimental Design with Deep Reinforcement LearningTom Blau, Edwin V. Bonilla, Iadine Chades, Amir DezfouliICML 2022 · 62 citations
- Markovian Interference in ExperimentsVivek F. Farias, Andrew A. Li, Tianyi Peng, Andrew ZhengNeurIPS 2022 · 52 citations
Related papers
- Optimal Treatment Allocation for Efficient Policy Evaluation in Sequential Decision MakingTing Li, Chengchun Shi, Jianing Wang, Fan Zhou et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 21 citations
- A More Accurate Algorithm Comparison through A/B Testing using Offline Evaluation MethodsKoki Konishi, Masataka Ushiku, Yuta SaitoKDD 2026 · 1 citation
- Exploiting Similarities in A/B Testing with Off-Policy EstimationOtmane Sakhi, Alexandre Gilotte, David RohdeKDD 2026 · 2 citations
- Efficient Multi-Policy Evaluation for Reinforcement LearningShuze Daniel Liu, Claire Chen, Shangtong ZhangAAAI 2025 · 2 citations
- Statistical Inference on Multi-armed Bandits with Delayed FeedbackLei Shi, Jingshen Wang, Tianhao WuICML 2023 · 7 citations
