Optimal Treatment Allocation for Efficient Policy Evaluation in Sequential Decision Making
Ting Li, Chengchun Shi, Jianing Wang, Fan Zhou, Hongtu Zhu
Abstract
A/B testing is critical for modern technological companies to evaluate the effectiveness of newly developed products against standard baselines. This paper studies optimal designs that aim to maximize the amount of information obtained from online experiments to estimate treatment effects accurately. We propose three optimal allocation strategies in a dynamic setting where treatments are sequentially assigned over time. These strategies are designed to minimize the variance of the treatment effect estimator when data follow a non-Markov decision process or a (time-varying) Markov decision process. We further develop estimation procedures based on existing off-policy evaluation (OPE) methods and conduct extensive experiments in various environments to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed methodologies. In theory, we prove the optimality of the proposed treatment allocation design and establish upper bounds for the mean squared errors of the resulting treatment effect estimators.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 8acf2b6b-3cab-4967-9375-6bfba8dfb124Cited by top-tier papers9
- Doubly Robust Alignment for Large Language ModelsErhan Xu, Kai Ye, Hongyi Zhou, Luhan Zhu et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 14 citations
- Pessimistic Data Integration for Policy EvaluationXiangkun Wu, Ting Li, Gholamali Aminian, Armin Behnamnia et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 2 citations
- Designing Time Series Experiments in A/B Testing with Transformer Reinforcement LearningXiangkun Wu, Qianglin Wen, Yingying Zhang, Hongtu Zhu et al.ICLR 2026 · 1 citation
- Demystifying the Paradox of Importance Sampling with an Estimated History-Dependent Behavior Policy in Off-Policy EvaluationHongyi Zhou, Josiah P. Hanna, Jin Zhu, Ying Yang et al.ICML 2025
- A Minimax Approach for Optimal Intervention Policy Learning with Two-Stage OutcomesChenyang Li, Hao Mei, Yue LiuICML 2026
Builds on16
- Is Pessimism Provably Efficient for Offline RL?Ying Jin, Zhuoran Yang, Zhaoran WangICML 2021 · 419 citations
- Minimax Weight and Q-Function Learning for Off-Policy EvaluationMasatoshi Uehara, Jiawei Huang, Nan JiangICML 2020 · 199 citations
- Deep Adaptive Design: Amortizing Sequential Bayesian Experimental DesignAdam Foster, Desi R. Ivanova, Ilyas Malik, Tom RainforthICML 2021 · 119 citations
- Optimizing Sequential Experimental Design with Deep Reinforcement LearningTom Blau, Edwin V. Bonilla, Iadine Chades, Amir DezfouliICML 2022 · 62 citations
- Post-Contextual-Bandit InferenceAurélien Bibaut, Maria Dimakopoulou, Nathan Kallus, Antoine Chambaz et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 58 citations
Related papers
- Adaptive Experimental Design with Temporal Interference: A Maximum Likelihood ApproachPeter W. Glynn, Ramesh Johari, Mohammad RasouliNeurIPS 2020 · 45 citations
- Non-stationary Experimental Design under Linear TrendsDavid Simchi-Levi, Chonghuan Wang, Zeyu ZhengNeurIPS 2023 · 6 citations
- Robust Sequential Experimental Design for A/B TestingQianglin Wen, Xiangkun Wu, Chengchun Shi, Ting Li et al.ICML 2026
- A/B Test and Online Experiment Under Diminishing Marginal Effects: Regret Minimization and Statistical InferenceJingxu Xu, Yuhang Wu, Yingfei Wang, Chu Wang et al.KDD 2025
- Interference, Bias, and Variance in Two-Sided Marketplace Experimentation: Guidance for PlatformsHannah Li, Geng Zhao, Ramesh Johari, Gabriel Y. WeintraubWWW 2022 · 46 citations
