Systematic Task Exploration with LLMs: A Study in Citation Text Generation
Furkan Sahinuç, Ilia Kuznetsov, Yufang Hou, Iryna Gurevych
Abstract
Large language models (LLMs) bring unprecedented flexibility in defining and executing complex, creative natural language generation (NLG) tasks. Yet, this flexibility brings new challenges, as it introduces new degrees of freedom in formulating the task inputs and instructions and in evaluating model performance. To facilitate the exploration of creative NLG tasks, we propose a three-component research framework that consists of systematic input manipulation, reference data, and output measurement. We use this framework to explore citation text generation -a popular scholarly NLP task that lacks consensus on the task definition and evaluation metric and has not yet been tackled within the LLM paradigm. Our results highlight the importance of systematically investigating both task instruction and input configuration when prompting LLMs, and reveal non-trivial relationships between different evaluation metrics used for citation text generation. Additional human generation and human evaluation experiments provide new qualitative insights into the task to guide future research in citation text generation. We make our code 1 and data 2 publicly available.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 59ab4fcd-7d86-46e5-a606-2e33f02fc73aCited by top-tier papers5
- HalluCitation Matters: Revealing the Impact of Hallucinated References with 300 Hallucinated Papers in ACL ConferencesYusuke Sakai, Hidetaka Kamigaito, Taro WatanabeACL 2026 · 18 citations
- Attribution, Citation, and Quotation: A Survey of Evidence-based Text Generation with Large Language ModelsTobias Schreieder, Tim Schopf, Michael FärberACL 2026 · 10 citations
- In-depth Research Impact Summarization through Fine-Grained Temporal Citation AnalysisHiba Arnaout, Noy Sternlicht, Tom Hope, Iryna GurevychACL 2026 · 3 citations
- Paraphrasing as Zero-shot Translation with Feature-guided Diversity EnhancementZiyue Yan, Hongying Zan, Xinglin Lyu, Hongfei XuACL 2026
- EMODIS: A Benchmark for Context-Dependent Emoji Disambiguation in Large Language ModelsJiacheng Huang, Ning Yu, Xiaoyin YiAAAI 2026
Builds on19
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 24,707 citations
- BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTTianyi Zhang, Varsha Kishore, Felix Wu, Kilian Q. Weinberger et al.ICLR 2020 · 8,443 citations
- Large Language Models are Zero-Shot ReasonersTakeshi Kojima, Shixiang Shane Gu, Machel Reid, Yutaka Matsuo et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 8,168 citations
- Multitask Prompted Training Enables Zero-Shot Task GeneralizationVictor Sanh, Albert Webson, Colin Raffel, Stephen H. Bach et al.ICLR 2022 · 1,976 citations
- Fantastically Ordered Prompts and Where to Find Them: Overcoming Few-Shot Prompt Order SensitivityYao Lu, Max Bartolo, Alastair Moore, Sebastian Riedel et al.ACL 2022 · 1,494 citations
Related papers
- CiteGuard: Faithful Citation Attribution for LLMs via Retrieval-Augmented ValidationYee Man Choi, Xuehang Guo, Yi R. Fung, Qingyun WangACL 2026 · 7 citations
- Leveraging Large Language Models for NLG Evaluation: Advances and ChallengesZhen Li, Xiaohan Xu, Tao Shen, Can Xu et al.EMNLP 2024 · 17 citations
- Themis: A Reference-free NLG Evaluation Language Model with Flexibility and InterpretabilityXinyu Hu, Li Lin, Mingqi Gao, Xunjian Yin et al.EMNLP 2024 · 2 citations
- CiteBench: A Benchmark for Scientific Citation Text GenerationMartin Funkquist, Ilia Kuznetsov, Yufang Hou, Iryna GurevychEMNLP 2023 · 2 citations
- Can Large Language Models Be an Alternative to Human Evaluations?David Cheng-Han Chiang, Hung-yi LeeACL 2023 · 254 citations
