Pruning neural network models for gene regulatory dynamics using data and domain knowledge
Intekhab Hossain, Jonas Fischer, Rebekka Burkholz, John Quackenbush
Abstract
The practical utility of machine learning models in the sciences often hinges on their interpretability. It is common to assess a model's merit for scientific discovery, and thus novel insights, by how well it aligns with already available domain knowledge-a dimension that is currently largely disregarded in the comparison of neural network models. While pruning can simplify deep neural network architectures and excels in identifying sparse models, as we show in the context of gene regulatory network inference, state-of-the-art techniques struggle with biologically meaningful structure learning. To address this issue, we propose DASH ‡ , a generalizable framework that guides network pruning by using domain-specific structural information in model fitting and leads to sparser, better interpretable models that are more robust to noise. Using both synthetic data with ground truth information, as well as real-world gene expression data, we show that DASH, using knowledge about gene interaction partners within the putative regulatory network, outperforms general pruning methods by a large margin and yields deeper insights into the biological systems being studied.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 592048e7-44ee-43bd-a146-04e4684e8f95Builds on17
- Pruning neural networks without any data by iteratively conserving synaptic flowHidenori Tanaka, Daniel Kunin, Daniel L. K. Yamins, Surya GanguliNeurIPS 2020 · 884 citations
- Comparing Rewinding and Fine-tuning in Neural Network PruningAlex Renda, Jonathan Frankle, Michael CarbinICLR 2020 · 437 citations
- Proving the Lottery Ticket Hypothesis: Pruning is All You NeedEran Malach, Gilad Yehudai, Shai Shalev-Shwartz, Ohad ShamirICML 2020 · 327 citations
- Soft Threshold Weight Reparameterization for Learnable SparsityAditya Kusupati, Vivek Ramanujan, Raghav Somani, Mitchell Wortsman et al.ICML 2020 · 266 citations
- Winning the Lottery with Continuous SparsificationPedro Savarese, Hugo Silva, Michael MaireNeurIPS 2020 · 162 citations
Related papers
- Regularized Pairwise Relationship based Analytics for Structured DataZhaojing Luo, Shaofeng Cai, Yatong Wang, Beng Chin OoiSIGMOD 2023 · 12 citations
- Rethinking Pruning for Accelerating Deep Inference At the EdgeDawei Gao, Xiaoxi He, Zimu Zhou, Yongxin Tong et al.KDD 2020 · 24 citations
- SPADE: Sparsity-Guided Debugging for Deep Neural NetworksArshia Soltani Moakhar, Eugenia Iofinova, Elias Frantar, Dan AlistarhICML 2024 · 2 citations
- GAPrune: Gradient-Alignment Pruning for Domain-Aware EmbeddingsYixuan Tang, Yi YangICLR 2026 · 2 citations
- Adaptive Knowledge Driven Regularization for Deep Neural NetworksZhaojing Luo, Shaofeng Cai, Can Cui, Beng Chin Ooi et al.AAAI 2021 · 15 citations
