Incompressible Encodings
Tal Moran, Daniel Wichs
Abstract
An incompressible encoding can probabilistically encode some data m into a codeword c, which is not much larger. Anyone can decode the codeword c to recover the original data m. However, the codeword c cannot be efficiently compressed, even if the original data m is given to the decompression procedure on the side. In other words, c is an efficiently decodable representation of m, yet is computationally incompressible even given m. An incompressible encoding is composable if many encodings cannot be simultaneously compressed.
The recent work of Damgård, Ganesh and Orlandi (CRYPTO '19) defined a variant of incompressible encodings as a building block for "proofs of replicated storage". They constructed incompressible encodings in an ideal permutation model, but it was left open if they can be constructed under standard assumptions, or even in the more basic random-oracle model. In this work, we undertake the comprehensive study of incompressible encodings as a primitive of independent interest and give new constructions, negative results and applications:
• We construct incompressible encodings in the common random string (CRS) model under either Decisional Composite Residuosity (DCR) or Learning with Errors (LWE). However, the construction has several drawbacks: (1) it is not composable, (2) it only achieves selective security, and (3) the CRS is as long as the data m.
• We leverage the above construction to also get a scheme in the random-oracle model, under the same assumptions, that avoids all of the above drawbacks. Furthermore, it is significantly more efficient than the prior ideal-model construction.
• We give black-box separations, showing that incompressible encodings in the plain model cannot be proven secure under any standard hardness assumption, and incompressible encodings in the CRS model must inherently suffer from all of the drawbacks above.
• We give a new application to "big-key cryptography in the bounded-retrieval model", where secret keys are made intentionally huge to make them hard to exfiltrate. Using incompressible encodings, we can get all the security benefits of a big key without wasting storage space, by having the key to encode useful data.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 591dcca8-9c9d-4863-aa48-7efaf1813fa0Cited by top-tier papers3
- Incompressible CryptographyJiaxin Guan, Daniel Wichs, Mark ZhandryEUROCRYPT 2022 · 16 citations
- Targeted Lossy Functions and ApplicationsWilly Quach, Brent Waters, Daniel WichsCRYPTO 2021 · 9 citations
- Lossy Cryptography from Code-Based AssumptionsQuang Dao, Aayush JainCRYPTO 2024 · 8 citations
Builds on1
Related papers
- Key-Homomorphic Computations for RAM: Fully Succinct Randomised Encodings and MoreDamiano Abram, Giulio Malavolta, Lawrence RoyCRYPTO 2025 · 6 citations
- How to Compress Encrypted DataNils Fleischhacker, Kasper Green Larsen, Mark SimkinEUROCRYPT 2023 · 5 citations
- On One-Shot Signatures, Quantum vs. Classical Binding, and Obfuscating PermutationsOmri Shmueli, Mark ZhandryCRYPTO 2025 · 6 citations
- Unclonable Encryption in the Haar Random Oracle ModelJames Bartusek, Eli GoldinCRYPTO 2026
- Pseudorandom Error-Correcting CodesMiranda Christ, Sam GunnCRYPTO 2024 · 17 citations
