MOA: Multi-Objective Alignment for Role-Playing Agents
Chonghua Liao, Ke Wang, Yuchuan Wu, Ruoran Li, Fei Huang, Yongbin Li
Abstract
Role-playing agents (RPAs) require balancing multiple objectives, such as instruction following, persona consistency, and stylistic fidelity, which are not always perfectly aligned across different dimensions. While prior work has primarily relied on supervised fine-tuning or reinforcement learning with scalarized rewards, these approaches do not explicitly address the coordination of multiple reward dimensions during optimization. We present MOA (Multi-Objective Alignment), a reinforcement-learning framework that enables multi-dimensional, fine-grained rubric optimization for general RPAs. MOA introduces a novel multi-objective optimization strategy that trains simultaneously on multiple fine-grained rubrics to boost optimization performance. Additionally, to improve both output diversity and generation quality, we employ thought-augmented rollouts with off-policy guidance. Experiments on PersonaGym and RoleMRC show that MOA consistently improves multi-dimensional role-playing performance over supervised and standard RL baselines. Under identical evaluation protocols, an 8B model trained with MOA reaches performance competitive with strong closed-source models across multiple evaluation dimensions. These results suggest that MOA provides a practical framework for training more capable general-purpose role-playing agents.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 58c84869-951f-44d6-b4d9-6090fdc39d29Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on12
- Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward ModelRafael Rafailov, Archit Sharma, Eric Mitchell, Christopher D. Manning et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 10,924 citations
- Measuring Massive Multitask Language UnderstandingDan Hendrycks, Collin Burns, Steven Basart, Andy Zou et al.ICLR 2021 · 7,905 citations
- Generative Agents: Interactive Simulacra of Human BehaviorJoon Sung Park, Joseph C. O'Brien, Carrie Jun Cai, Meredith Ringel Morris et al.UIST 2023 · 1,882 citations
- Learning to Reason under Off-Policy GuidanceJianhao Yan, Yafu Li, Zican Hu, Zhi Wang et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 310 citations
- TTRL: Test-Time Reinforcement LearningYuxin Zuo, Kaiyan Zhang, Li Sheng, Shang Qu et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 249 citations
Related papers
- CRPO: Character-centric Group Relative Policy Optimization for Role-aware Reasoning in Role-playing AgentsYihong Tang, Kehai Chen, Liang Yue, Benyou Wang et al.ICML 2026
- R4: Nested Reasoning-Retrieval for Reward Modeling in Role-Playing AgentsRenzhi Wang, Chongqiang Wei, Zhisheng Wang, Piji LiICLR 2026
- Improving Retrieval-Augmented Generation through Multi-Agent Reinforcement LearningYiqun Chen, Lingyong Yan, Weiwei Sun, Xinyu Ma et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 47 citations
- Alternating Reinforcement Learning for Rubric-Based Reward Modeling in Non-Verifiable LLM Post-TrainingRan Xu, Tianci Liu, Zihan Dong, Tony Yu et al.ICML 2026
- WebGym: Scaling Training Environments for Long-Horizon Visual Web Agents with Realistic TasksHao Bai, Alexey Taymanov, Tong Zhang, Aviral Kumar et al.CVPR 2026
