To update or not to update? Neurons at equilibrium in deep models
Andrea Bragagnolo, Enzo Tartaglione, Marco Grangetto
Abstract
Recent advances in deep learning optimization showed that, with some a-posteriori information on fully-trained models, it is possible to match the same performance by simply training a subset of their parameters. Such a discovery has a broad impact from theory to applications, driving the research towards methods to identify the minimum subset of parameters to train without look-ahead information exploitation. However, the methods proposed do not match the state-of-the-art performance, and rely on unstructured sparsely connected models. In this work we shift our focus from the single parameters to the behavior of the whole neuron, exploiting the concept of neuronal equilibrium (NEq). When a neuron is in a configuration at equilibrium (meaning that it has learned a specific input-output relationship), we can halt its update; on the contrary, when a neuron is at non-equilibrium, we let its state evolve towards an equilibrium state, updating its parameters. The proposed approach has been tested on different state-of-the-art learning strategies and tasks, validating NEq and observing that the neuronal equilibrium depends on the specific learning setup.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers3
- Study of Training Dynamics for Memory-Constrained Fine-TuningAël Quélennec, Nour Hezbri, Pavlo Mozharovskyi, Van-Tam Nguyen et al.ICLR 2026 · 1 citation
- SURGEON: Memory-Adaptive Fully Test-Time Adaptation via Dynamic Activation SparsityKe Ma, Jiaqi Tang, Bin Guo, Fan Dang et al.CVPR 2025
- Efficient Resource-Constrained Training of Transformers via Subspace OptimizationLe-Trung Nguyen, Enzo Tartaglione, Van-Tam NguyenICLR 2026
Builds on11
- Swin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shifted WindowsZe Liu, Yutong Lin, Yue Cao, Han Hu et al.ICCV 2021 · 31,683 citations
- Pruning neural networks without any data by iteratively conserving synaptic flowHidenori Tanaka, Daniel Kunin, Daniel L. K. Yamins, Surya GanguliNeurIPS 2020 · 884 citations
- Linear Mode Connectivity and the Lottery Ticket HypothesisJonathan Frankle, Gintare Karolina Dziugaite, Daniel M. Roy, Michael CarbinICML 2020 · 750 citations
- Picking Winning Tickets Before Training by Preserving Gradient FlowChaoqi Wang, Guodong Zhang, Roger B. GrosseICLR 2020 · 743 citations
- Movement Pruning: Adaptive Sparsity by Fine-TuningVictor Sanh, Thomas Wolf, Alexander M. RushNeurIPS 2020 · 656 citations
Related papers
- Neural Deep Equilibrium SolversShaojie Bai, Vladlen Koltun, J. Zico KolterICLR 2022 · 36 citations
- The least-control principle for local learning at equilibriumAlexander Meulemans, Nicolas Zucchet, Seijin Kobayashi, Johannes von Oswald et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 32 citations
- Joint inference and input optimization in equilibrium networksSwaminathan Gurumurthy, Shaojie Bai, Zachary Manchester, J. Zico KolterNeurIPS 2021 · 22 citations
- Training Neural Networks with Fixed Sparse MasksYi-Lin Sung, Varun Nair, Colin RaffelNeurIPS 2021 · 295 citations
- Stabilizing Equilibrium Models by Jacobian RegularizationShaojie Bai, Vladlen Koltun, J. Zico KolterICML 2021 · 80 citations
