Interactive Debugging and Steering of Multi-Agent AI Systems
Will Epperson, Gagan Bansal, Victor C. Dibia, Adam Fourney, Jack Gerrits, Erkang (Eric) Zhu, Saleema Amershi
Abstract
Fully autonomous teams of LLM-powered AI agents are emerging that collaborate to perform complex tasks for users. What challenges do developers face when trying to build and debug these AI agent teams? In formative interviews with five AI agent developers, we identify core challenges: difficulty reviewing long agent conversations to localize errors, lack of support in current tools for interactive debugging, and the need for tool support to iterate on agent configuration. Based on these needs, we developed an interactive multi-agent debugging tool, AGDebugger, with a UI for browsing and sending messages, the ability to edit and reset prior agent messages, and an overview visualization for navigating complex message histories. In a two-part user study with 14 participants, we identify common user strategies for steering agents and highlight the importance of interactive message resets for debugging. Our studies deepen understanding of interfaces for debugging increasingly important agentic workflows.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 57c64498-7fc8-4db9-895d-ed2441c9a06aCited by top-tier papers14
- Gaia2: Benchmarking LLM Agents on Dynamic and Asynchronous EnvironmentsRomain Froger, Pierre Andrews, Matteo Bettini, Amar Budhiraja et al.ICLR 2026 · 29 citations
- DoVer: Intervention-Driven Auto Debugging for LLM Multi-Agent SystemsMing Ma, Jue Zhang, Fangkai Yang, Yu Kang et al.ICLR 2026 · 24 citations
- CORRECT: COndensed eRror RECognition via knowledge Transfer in multi-agent systemsYifan Yu, Moyan Li, Shaoyuan Xu, Jinmiao Fu et al.ICML 2026 · 9 citations
- Understanding Software Engineering Agents: A Study of Thought-Action-Result TrajectoriesIslem Bouzenia, Michael PradelASE 2025 · 3 citations
- Code with Me or for Me? How Increasing AI Automation Transforms Developer WorkflowsValerie Chen, Ameet Talwalkar, Robert Brennan, Graham NeubigCHI 2026 · 2 citations
Builds on19
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 citations
- SWE-bench: Can Language Models Resolve Real-world Github Issues?Carlos E. Jimenez, John Yang, Alexander Wettig, Shunyu Yao et al.ICLR 2024 · 2,082 citations
- CAMEL: Communicative Agents for "Mind" Exploration of Large Language Model SocietyGuohao Li, Hasan Hammoud, Hani Itani, Dmitrii Khizbullin et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 1,975 citations
- WebArena: A Realistic Web Environment for Building Autonomous AgentsShuyan Zhou, Frank F. Xu, Hao Zhu, Xuhui Zhou et al.ICLR 2024 · 1,197 citations
- Why Johnny Can't Prompt: How Non-AI Experts Try (and Fail) to Design LLM PromptsJ. D. Zamfirescu-Pereira, Richmond Y. Wong, Bjoern Hartmann, Qian YangCHI 2023 · 892 citations
Related papers
- ChatDev: Communicative Agents for Software DevelopmentChen Qian, Wei Liu, Hongzhang Liu, Nuo Chen et al.ACL 2024
- An LLM-based multi-agent framework for agile effort estimationThanh-Long Bui, Hoa Khanh Dam, Rashina HodaASE 2025 · 2 citations
- DiLLS: Interactive Diagnosis of LLM-based Multi-agent Systems via Layered Summary of Agent BehaviorsRui Sheng, Yukun Yang, Chuhan Shi, Yanna Lin et al.CHI 2026 · 2 citations
- ChatDBG: Augmenting Debugging with Large Language ModelsKyla Levin, Nicolas van Kempen, Emery D. Berger, Stephen N. FreundFSE 2025 · 3 citations
- AutoML-Agent: A Multi-Agent LLM Framework for Full-Pipeline AutoMLPatara Trirat, Wonyong Jeong, Sung Ju HwangICML 2025
