DoVer: Intervention-Driven Auto Debugging for LLM Multi-Agent Systems
Ming Ma, Jue Zhang, Fangkai Yang, Yu Kang, Qingwei Lin, Saravan Rajmohan, Dongmei Zhang
Abstract
Large language model (LLM)-based multi-agent systems are challenging to debug because failures often arise from long, branching interaction traces. The prevailing practice is to leverage LLMs for log-based failure localization, attributing errors to a specific agent and step. However, this paradigm has two key limitations: (i) log-only debugging lacks validation, producing untested hypotheses, and (ii) single-step or single-agent attribution is often ill-posed, as we find that multiple distinct interventions can independently repair the failed task. To address the first limitation, we introduce DoVer, an intervention-driven debugging framework, which augments hypothesis generation with active verification through targeted interventions (e.g., editing messages, altering plans). For the second limitation, rather than evaluating on attribution accuracy, we focus on measuring whether the system resolves the failure or makes quantifiable progress toward task success, reflecting a more outcome-oriented view of debugging. Within the Magnetic-One agent framework, on the datasets derived from GAIA and AssistantBench, DoVer flips 18-28% of failed trials into successes, achieves up to 16% milestone progress, and validates or refutes 30-60% of failure hypotheses. DoVer also performs effectively on a different dataset (GSMPlus) and agent framework (AG2), where it recovers 49% of failed trials. These results highlight intervention as a practical mechanism for improving reliability in agentic systems and open opportunities for more robust, scalable debugging methods for LLM-based multi-agent systems. Project website and code will be available at https://aka.ms/DoVer .
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Builds on14
- Reflexion: language agents with verbal reinforcement learningNoah Shinn, Federico Cassano, Ashwin Gopinath, Karthik Narasimhan et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 5,828 citations
- Self-Refine: Iterative Refinement with Self-FeedbackAman Madaan, Niket Tandon, Prakhar Gupta, Skyler Hallinan et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 4,972 citations
- CAMEL: Communicative Agents for "Mind" Exploration of Large Language Model SocietyGuohao Li, Hasan Hammoud, Hani Itani, Dmitrii Khizbullin et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 1,975 citations
- GAIA: a benchmark for General AI AssistantsGrégoire Mialon, Clémentine Fourrier, Thomas Wolf, Yann LeCun et al.ICLR 2024 · 716 citations
- CRITIC: Large Language Models Can Self-Correct with Tool-Interactive CritiquingZhibin Gou, Zhihong Shao, Yeyun Gong, Yelong Shen et al.ICLR 2024 · 699 citations
Related papers
- DiLLS: Interactive Diagnosis of LLM-based Multi-agent Systems via Layered Summary of Agent BehaviorsRui Sheng, Yukun Yang, Chuhan Shi, Yanna Lin et al.CHI 2026 · 2 citations
- Scope Delineation Before Localization: A Two-Stage Framework for Enhancing Failure Attribution in Multi-Agent SystemsKai Sun, Wenqiang Li, Bo Dong, Yuxin Lin et al.AAAI 2026
- AgenTracer: Who Is Inducing Failure in the LLM Agentic Systems?Guibin Zhang, Junhao Wang, Junjie Chen, Wangchunshu Zhou et al.ICLR 2026 · 107 citations
- Watson: A Cognitive Observability Framework for the Reasoning of LLM-Powered AgentsBenjamin Rombaut, Sogol Masoumzadeh, Kirill Vasilevski, Dayi Lin et al.ASE 2025 · 1 citation
- Aegis: Automated Error Generation and Attribution for Multi-Agent SystemsFanqi Kong, Ruijie Zhang, Huaxiao Yin, Guibin Zhang et al.ICLR 2026 · 16 citations
