Reliable Causal Discovery with Improved Exact Search and Weaker Assumptions
Ignavier Ng, Yujia Zheng, Jiji Zhang, Kun Zhang
Abstract
Many of the causal discovery methods rely on the faithfulness assumption to guarantee asymptotic correctness. However, the assumption can be approximately violated in many ways, leading to sub-optimal solutions. Although there is a line of research in Bayesian network structure learning that focuses on weakening the assumption, such as exact search methods with well-defined score functions, they do not scale well to large graphs. In this work, we introduce several strategies to improve the scalability of exact score-based methods in the linear Gaussian setting. In particular, we develop a super-structure estimation method based on the support of inverse covariance matrix which requires assumptions that are strictly weaker than faithfulness, and apply it to restrict the search space of exact search. We also propose a local search strategy that performs exact search on the local clusters formed by each variable and its neighbors within two hops in the superstructure. Numerical experiments validate the efficacy of the proposed procedure, and demonstrate that it scales up to hundreds of nodes with a high accuracy. Recently, NOTEARS [52] casts the Bayesian network structure learning task into a continuous constrained optimization problem with the least squares objective, using an algebraic characterization of directed acyclic graph (DAG). Subsequent work GOLEM [23] adopts a continuous unconstrained optimization formulation with a likelihood-based objective. For NOTEARS, it remains unclear 35th Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS 2021).
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 56cb5632-e25d-4165-b6f9-a9ec3d6d94e9Cited by top-tier papers10
- Causal Representation Learning from Multiple Distributions: A General SettingKun Zhang, Shaoan Xie, Ignavier Ng, Yujia ZhengICML 2024 · 61 citations
- On Causal Discovery in the Presence of Deterministic RelationsLoka Li, Haoyue Dai, Hanin Al Ghothani, Biwei Huang et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 10 citations
- Whole Page Unbiased Learning to RankHaitao Mao, Lixin Zou, Yujia Zheng, Jiliang Tang et al.WWW 2024 · 6 citations
- DCILP: A Distributed Approach for Large-Scale Causal Structure LearningShuyu Dong, Michèle Sebag, Kento Uemura, Akito Fujii et al.AAAI 2025 · 3 citations
- Distributionally Robust Skeleton Learning of Discrete Bayesian NetworksYeshu Li, Brian D. ZiebartNeurIPS 2023 · 1 citation
Builds on3
- On the Role of Sparsity and DAG Constraints for Learning Linear DAGsIgnavier Ng, AmirEmad Ghassami, Kun ZhangNeurIPS 2020 · 306 citations
- Characterizing Distribution Equivalence and Structure Learning for Cyclic and Acyclic Directed GraphsAmirEmad Ghassami, Alan Yang, Negar Kiyavash, Kun ZhangICML 2020 · 32 citations
- Improving Causal Discovery By Optimal Bayesian Network LearningNi Y. Lu, Kun Zhang, Changhe YuanAAAI 2021 · 25 citations
Related papers
- Learning Large DAGs by Combining Continuous Optimization and Feedback Arc Set HeuristicsPierre Gillot, Pekka ParviainenAAAI 2022 · 5 citations
- DAGs with No Fears: A Closer Look at Continuous Optimization for Learning Bayesian NetworksDennis Wei, Tian Gao, Yue YuNeurIPS 2020 · 102 citations
- BCD Nets: Scalable Variational Approaches for Bayesian Causal DiscoveryChris Cundy, Aditya Grover, Stefano ErmonNeurIPS 2021 · 105 citations
- Turbocharging Treewidth-Bounded Bayesian Network Structure LearningVaidyanathan Peruvemba Ramaswamy, Stefan SzeiderAAAI 2021 · 19 citations
- Integer Programming for Causal Structure Learning in the Presence of Latent VariablesRui Chen, Sanjeeb Dash, Tian GaoICML 2021 · 19 citations
