S²R: Teaching LLMs to Self-verify and Self-correct via Reinforcement Learning
Ruotian Ma, Peisong Wang, Cheng Liu, Xingyan Liu, Jiaqi Chen, Bang Zhang, Xin Zhou, Nan Du, Jia Li
Abstract
Recent studies have demonstrated the effectiveness of LLM test-time scaling. However, existing approaches to incentivize LLMs' deep thinking abilities generally require large-scale data or significant training efforts. Meanwhile, it remains unclear how to improve the thinking abilities of less powerful base models. In this work, we introduce SR, an efficient framework that enhances LLM reasoning by teaching models to self-verify and self-correct during inference. Specifically, we first initialize LLMs with iterative self-verification and self-correction behaviors through supervised fine-tuning on carefully curated data. The self-verification and self-correction skills are then further strengthened by both outcome-level and process-level reinforcement learning, with minimized resource requirements, enabling the model to adaptively refine its reasoning process during inference. Our results demonstrate that, with only 3.1k self-verifying and self-correcting behavior initialization samples, Qwen2.5-math-7B achieves an accuracy improvement from 51.0% to 81.6%, outperforming models trained on an equivalent amount of long-CoT distilled data. Extensive experiments and analysis based on three base models across both in-domain and out-of-domain benchmarks validate the effectiveness of SR. Our code and data are available at https://github.com/NineAbyss/S2R.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 55feb777-379a-4eb7-84ed-a87dd0bd0e3aCited by top-tier papers10
- Process vs. Outcome Reward: Which is Better for Agentic RAG Reinforcement LearningWenlin Zhang, Xiangyang Li, Kuicai Dong, Yichao Wang et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 85 citations
- Learning When to Think: Shaping Adaptive Reasoning in R1-Style Models via Multi-Stage RLSongjun Tu, Jiahao Lin, Qichao Zhang, Xiangyu Tian et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 69 citations
- Trust, But Verify: A Self-Verification Approach to Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable RewardsXiaoyuan Liu, Tian Liang, Zhiwei He, Jiahao Xu et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 46 citations
- SPC: Evolving Self-Play Critic via Adversarial Games for LLM ReasoningJiaqi Chen, Bang Zhang, Ruotian Ma, Peisong Wang et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 43 citations
- Does Reinforcement Fine-Tuning Improve Generalization of LLM Agents? An Empirical StudyZhiheng Xi, Xin Guo, Jiaqi Liu, Jiazheng Zhang et al.ICML 2026 · 3 citations
Builds on25
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 24,707 citations
- Reflexion: language agents with verbal reinforcement learningNoah Shinn, Federico Cassano, Ashwin Gopinath, Karthik Narasimhan et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 5,828 citations
- Let's Verify Step by StepHunter Lightman, Vineet Kosaraju, Yuri Burda, Harrison Edwards et al.ICLR 2024 · 3,045 citations
- Scaling Laws for Reward Model OveroptimizationLeo Gao, John Schulman, Jacob HiltonICML 2023 · 963 citations
- Large Language Models Cannot Self-Correct Reasoning YetJie Huang, Xinyun Chen, Swaroop Mishra, Huaixiu Steven Zheng et al.ICLR 2024 · 858 citations
Related papers
- Incentivizing LLMs to Self-Verify Their AnswersFuxiang Zhang, Jiacheng Xu, Chaojie Wang, Ce Cui et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 20 citations
- Provable Benefits of RLVR over SFT for Reasoning Models: Learning to Backtrack EfficientlyStanley Wei, Juno KimICML 2026
- Re2: Unlocking LLM Reasoning via Reinforcement Learning with Re-solvingPinzheng Wang, Shuli Xu, Juntao Li, Yu Luo et al.ICLR 2026 · 7 citations
- ReVISE: Learning to Refine at Test-Time via Intrinsic Self-VerificationHyunseok Lee, Seunghyuk Oh, Jaehyung Kim, Jinwoo Shin et al.ICML 2025
- VeriThinker: Learning to Verify Makes Reasoning Model EfficientZigeng Chen, Xinyin Ma, Gongfan Fang, Ruonan Yu et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 30 citations
