Responsible & Inclusive Cards: An Online Card Tool to Promote Critical Reflection in Technology Industry Work Practices
Salma Elsayed-Ali, Sara E. Berger, Vagner Figuerêdo de Santana, Juana Catalina Becerra Sandoval
Abstract
Societal implications of technology are often considered after public deployment. However, broader impacts ought to be considered during the onset and throughout development to reduce potential for harmful uses, biases, and exclusions. There is a need for tools and frameworks that help technologists become more aware of broader contexts of their work and engage in more responsible and inclusive practices. In this paper, we introduce an online card tool containing questions to scaffold critical reflection about projects’ impacts on society, business, and research. We present the iterative design of the Responsible & Inclusive Cards and findings from five workshops (n=21 participants) with teams distributed across a multinational technology corporation, as well as interviews with people with disabilities to assess gameplay and mental models. We found the tool promoted discussions about challenging topics, reduced power gaps through democratized turn-taking, and enabled participants to identify concrete areas to improve their practice.
Ask about this paper
Ask your agent about it.
Lune has read the top-tier papers around this one, so every answer names the papers it rests on.
Your agent calls
Lunesearch_papers
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers get 55644589-e560-4d6c-b943-63e06a747716Cited by top-tier papers16
- Guidelines for Integrating Value Sensitive Design in Responsible AI ToolkitsMalak Sadek, Marios Constantinides, Daniele Quercia, Céline MougenotCHI 2024 · 49 citations
- A Scoping Study of Evaluation Practices for Responsible AI Tools: Steps Towards Effectiveness EvaluationsGlen Berman, Nitesh Goyal, Michael MadaioCHI 2024 · 40 citations
- RAI Guidelines: Method for Generating Responsible AI Guidelines Grounded in Regulations and Usable by (Non-)Technical RolesMarios Constantinides, Edyta Paulina Bogucka, Daniele Quercia, Susanna Kallio et al.CSCW 2024 · 28 citations
- Designing a Card-Based Design Tool to Bridge Academic Research & Design Practice For Societal ResilienceNovia Nurain, Chia-Fang Chung, Clara Marques Caldeira, Kay ConnellyCHI 2024 · 16 citations
- I-Card: A Generative AI-Supported Intelligent Design Method Card DeckLiuqing Chen, Wengteng Cheang, Zhaojun Jiang, Yuan Xu et al.CHI 2025 · 11 citations
Related papers
- Participatory AI Justice in HCI: A Scoping ReviewMaria Luce Lupetti, Cristina Zaga, Nazli CilaCHI 2026 · 1 citation
- Co-Design of Technology with and for People with Intellectual Disabilities: A Scoping Review of Methods and Inclusion StrategiesJacqueline Johnstone, Madhuka Nadeeshani, Preity Pai, Troy McGee et al.CHI 2026 · 1 citation
- Supporting Industry Computing Researchers in Assessing, Articulating, and Addressing the Potential Negative Societal Impact of Their WorkWesley Hanwen Deng, Solon Barocas, Jennifer Wortman VaughanCSCW 2025 · 8 citations
- Power and Play: Investigating "License to Critique" in Teams' AI Ethics DiscussionsDavid Gray Widder, Laura Dabbish, James D. Herbsleb, Nikolas MartelaroCSCW 2024 · 13 citations
- Opening Research Commissioning To Civic Participation: Creating A Community Panel To Review The Social Impact of HCI Research ProposalsIan G. Johnson, Clara CrivellaroCHI 2021 · 14 citations
