Combining Experimental and Historical Data for Policy Evaluation
Ting Li, Chengchun Shi, Qianglin Wen, Yang Sui, Yongli Qin, Chunbo Lai, Hongtu Zhu
Abstract
This paper studies policy evaluation with multiple data sources, especially in scenarios that involve one experimental dataset with two arms, complemented by a historical dataset generated under a single control arm. We propose novel data integration methods that linearly integrate base policy value estimators constructed based on the experimental and historical data, with weights optimized to minimize the mean square error (MSE) of the resulting combined estimator. We further apply the pessimistic principle to obtain more robust estimators, and extend these developments to sequential decision making. Theoretically, we establish non-asymptotic error bounds for the MSEs of our proposed estimators, and derive their oracle, efficiency and robustness properties across a broad spectrum of reward shift scenarios. Numerical experiments and real-data-based analyses from a ridesharing company demonstrate the superior performance of the proposed estimators.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers5
- Doubly Robust Alignment for Large Language ModelsErhan Xu, Kai Ye, Hongyi Zhou, Luhan Zhu et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 14 citations
- Pessimistic Data Integration for Policy EvaluationXiangkun Wu, Ting Li, Gholamali Aminian, Armin Behnamnia et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 2 citations
- Designing Time Series Experiments in A/B Testing with Transformer Reinforcement LearningXiangkun Wu, Qianglin Wen, Yingying Zhang, Hongtu Zhu et al.ICLR 2026 · 1 citation
- Robust Sequential Experimental Design for A/B TestingQianglin Wen, Xiangkun Wu, Chengchun Shi, Ting Li et al.ICML 2026
- Privacy-Aware Data Integration for Enhanced Quantile Inference under HeterogeneityLeheng Cai, Qirui Hu, Shuyuan WuICML 2026
Builds on21
- Conservative Q-Learning for Offline Reinforcement LearningAviral Kumar, Aurick Zhou, George Tucker, Sergey LevineNeurIPS 2020 · 2,881 citations
- MOPO: Model-based Offline Policy OptimizationTianhe Yu, Garrett Thomas, Lantao Yu, Stefano Ermon et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 989 citations
- Is Pessimism Provably Efficient for Offline RL?Ying Jin, Zhuoran Yang, Zhaoran WangICML 2021 · 419 citations
- Bridging Offline Reinforcement Learning and Imitation Learning: A Tale of PessimismParia Rashidinejad, Banghua Zhu, Cong Ma, Jiantao Jiao et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 373 citations
- Bellman-consistent Pessimism for Offline Reinforcement LearningTengyang Xie, Ching-An Cheng, Nan Jiang, Paul Mineiro et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 339 citations
Related papers
- Off-Policy Evaluation via Adaptive Weighting with Data from Contextual BanditsRuohan Zhan, Vitor Hadad, David A. Hirshberg, Susan AtheyKDD 2021 · 22 citations
- Pessimism Principle Can Be Effective: Towards a Framework for Zero-Shot Transfer Reinforcement LearningChi Zhang, Zi-Jia Wang, George K. Atia, Sihong He et al.ICML 2025
- Doubly Optimal Policy Evaluation for Reinforcement LearningShuze Daniel Liu, Claire Chen, Shangtong ZhangICLR 2025
- Off-Policy Evaluation and Learning for External Validity under a Covariate ShiftMasatoshi Uehara, Masahiro Kato, Shota YasuiNeurIPS 2020 · 60 citations
- Doubly robust off-policy evaluation with shrinkageYi Su, Maria Dimakopoulou, Akshay Krishnamurthy, Miroslav DudíkICML 2020 · 128 citations
