The Role of Conversational Grounding in Supporting Symbiosis Between People and Digital Assistants
Janghee Cho, Emilee J. Rader
Abstract
In "smart speaker" digital assistant systems such as Google Home, there is no visual user interface, so people must learn about the system's capabilities and limitations by experimenting with different questions and commands. However, many new users give up quickly and limit their use to a few simple tasks. This is a problem for both the user and the system. Users who stop trying out new things cannot learn about new features and functionality, and the system receives less data upon which to base future improvements. Symbiosis-a mutually beneficial relationship-between AI systems like digital assistants and people is an important aspect of developing systems that are partners to humans and not just tools. In order to better understand requirements for symbiosis, we investigated the relationship between the types of digital assistant responses and users' subsequent questions, focusing on identifying interactions that were discouraging to users when speaking with a digital assistant. We conducted a user study with 20 participants who completed a series of information seeking tasks using the Google Home, and analyzed transcripts using a method based on applied conversation analysis. We found that the most common response from the Google Home, a version of "Sorry, I'm not sure how to help", provided no feedback for participants to build on when forming their next question. However, responses that provided somewhat strange but tangentially related answers were actually more helpful for conversational grounding, which extended the interaction. We discuss the connection between grounding and symbiosis, and present recommendations for requirements for forming partnerships with digital assistants.
CCS Concepts: • Human-centered computing → Empirical studies in HCI.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 53c12a33-2c98-45d0-a084-3a2cd9c8a62dCited by top-tier papers10
- "It's Kind of Like Code-Switching": Black Older Adults' Experiences with a Voice Assistant for Health Information SeekingChristina N. Harrington, Radhika Garg, Amanda T. Woodward, Dimitri WilliamsCHI 2022 · 99 citations
- Multi-Modal Repairs of Conversational Breakdowns in Task-Oriented DialogsToby Jia-Jun Li, Jingya Chen, Haijun Xia, Tom M. Mitchell et al.UIST 2020 · 98 citations
- Exploring Interactions Between Trust, Anthropomorphism, and Relationship Development in Voice AssistantsWilliam Seymour, Max Van KleekCSCW 2021 · 91 citations
- Putting Tools in Their Place: The Role of Time and Perspective in Human-AI Collaboration for Qualitative AnalysisJessica L. Feuston, Jed R. BrubakerCSCW 2021 · 89 citations
- Leveraging Large Language Models to Power Chatbots for Collecting User Self-Reported DataJing Wei, Sungdong Kim, Hyunhoon Jung, Young-Ho KimCSCW 2024 · 82 citations
Related papers
- Empowering Dyads of Older Adults With Mild Cognitive Impairment And Their Care Partners Using Conversational AgentsTamara Zubatiy, Kayci L. Vickers, Niharika Mathur, Elizabeth D. MynattCHI 2021 · 102 citations
- Understanding User Perceptions of Proactive Smart SpeakersJing Wei, Tilman Dingler, Vassilis KostakosUbiComp 2022 · 33 citations
- Owning and Sharing: Privacy Perceptions of Smart Speaker UsersNicole Meng, Dilara Keküllüoglu, Kami VanieaCSCW 2021 · 50 citations
- He Is Just Like Me: A Study of the Long-Term Use of Smart Speakers by Parents and ChildrenRadhika Garg, Subhasree SenguptaUbiComp 2020 · 139 citations
- "Learn, Use, and (Intermittently) Abandon": Exploring the Practices of Early Smart Speaker Adopters in Urban IndiaRadhika Garg, Hua Cui, Yash KapadiaCSCW 2021 · 15 citations
