A Workflow Analysis of Context-driven Conversational Recommendation
Shengnan Lyu, Arpit Rana, Scott Sanner, Mohamed Reda Bouadjenek
Abstract
A number of recent works have made seminal contributions to the understanding of user intent and recommender interaction in conversational recommendation. However, to date, these studies have not focused explicitly on context-driven interaction that underlies the typical use of more pervasive Question Answering (QA) focused conversational assistants like Amazon Alexa, Apple Siri, and Google Assistant. In this paper, we aim to understand a general workflow of natural context-driven conversational recommendation that arises from a pairwise study of a human user interacting with a human simulating the role of a recommender. In our analysis of this intrinsically organic human-to-human conversation, we observe a clear structure of interaction workflow consisting of a preference elicitation and refinement stage, followed by inquiry and critiquing stages after the first recommendation. To better understand the nature of these stages and the conversational flow within them, we augment existing taxonomies of intent and action to label all interactions at each stage and analyze the workflow. From this analysis, we identify distinct conversational characteristics of each stage, e.g., (i) the preference elicitation stage consists of significant iteration to clarify, refine, and obtain a mutual understanding of preferences, (ii) the inquiry and critiquing stage consists of extensive informational queries to understand features of the recommended item and to (implicitly) specify critiques, and (iii) explanation appears to drive a substantial portion of the post-recommendation interaction, suggesting that beyond the purpose of justification, explanation serves a critical role to direct the evolving conversation itself. Altogether, we contribute a novel qualitative and quantitative analysis of workflow in conversational recommendation that further refines our existing understanding of this important frontier of conversational systems and suggests a number of critical avenues for further research to better automate natural recommendation conversations.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers3
- Variational Reasoning about User Preferences for Conversational RecommendationZhaochun Ren, Zhi Tian, Dongdong Li, Pengjie Ren et al.SIGIR 2022 · 31 citations
- Distributional Contrastive Embedding for Clarification-based Conversational CritiquingTianshu Shen, Zheda Mai, Ga Wu, Scott SannerWWW 2022 · 6 citations
- Investigating Characteristics of Media Recommendation Solicitation in r/ifyoulikeblankMd Momen Bhuiyan, Donghan Hu, Andrew Jelson, Tanushree Mitra et al.CSCW 2024
Related papers
- When and How to Ask: Dynamic Preference Elicitation Strategies for Conversational RecommendationFeng Xia, Shuo Zhang, Xi WangSIGIR 2026
- Aligning Recommendation and Conversation via Dual ImitationJinfeng Zhou, Bo Wang, Minlie Huang, Dongming Zhao et al.EMNLP 2022 · 6 citations
- Learning to Infer User Implicit Preference in Conversational RecommendationChenhao Hu, Shuhua Huang, Yansen Zhang, Yubao LiuSIGIR 2022 · 38 citations
- Genie in the Bottle: Anthropomorphized Perceptions of Conversational AgentsAnastasia Kuzminykh, Jenny Sun, Nivetha Govindaraju, Jeff Avery et al.CHI 2020 · 41 citations
- Enhancing User Personalization in Conversational RecommendersAllen Lin, Ziwei Zhu, Jianling Wang, James CaverleeWWW 2023 · 18 citations
