Generative Perturbation Analysis for Probabilistic Black-Box Anomaly Attribution
Tsuyoshi Idé, Naoki Abe
Abstract
We address the task of probabilistic anomaly attribution in the blackbox regression setting, where the goal is to compute the probability distribution of the attribution score of each input variable, given an observed anomaly. The training dataset is assumed to be unavailable. This task differs from the standard XAI (explainable AI) scenario, since we wish to explain the anomalous deviation from a black-box prediction rather than the black-box model itself. We begin by showing that mainstream model-agnostic explanation methods, such as the Shapley values, are not suitable for this task because of their "deviation-agnostic property." We then propose a novel framework for probabilistic anomaly attribution that allows us to not only compute attribution scores as the predictive mean but also quantify the uncertainty of those scores. This is done by considering a generative process for perturbations that counter-factually bring the observed anomalous observation back to normalcy. We introduce a variational Bayes algorithm for deriving the distributions of per variable attribution scores. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first probabilistic anomaly attribution framework that is free from being deviation-agnostic. CCS CONCEPTS • Mathematics of computing → Computing most probable explanation; Variational methods.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Builds on9
- The Many Shapley Values for Model ExplanationMukund Sundararajan, Amir NajmiICML 2020 · 799 citations
- Understanding Deep Networks via Extremal Perturbations and Smooth MasksRuth Fong, Mandela Patrick, Andrea VedaldiICCV 2019 · 480 citations
- Problems with Shapley-value-based explanations as feature importance measuresI. Elizabeth Kumar, Suresh Venkatasubramanian, Carlos Scheidegger, Sorelle A. FriedlerICML 2020 · 458 citations
- Reliable Post hoc Explanations: Modeling Uncertainty in ExplainabilityDylan Slack, Anna Hilgard, Sameer Singh, Himabindu LakkarajuNeurIPS 2021 · 240 citations
- Do Feature Attribution Methods Correctly Attribute Features?Yilun Zhou, Serena Booth, Marco Túlio Ribeiro, Julie ShahAAAI 2022 · 167 citations
Related papers
- Towards Trustable SHAP ScoresOlivier Létoffé, Xuanxiang Huang, João Marques-SilvaAAAI 2025 · 23 citations
- Explaining Black-Box Algorithms Using Probabilistic Contrastive CounterfactualsSainyam Galhotra, Romila Pradhan, Babak SalimiSIGMOD 2021 · 85 citations
- Anomaly Attribution with Likelihood CompensationTsuyoshi Idé, Amit Dhurandhar, Jirí Navrátil, Moninder Singh et al.AAAI 2021 · 16 citations
- GEFA: A General Feature Attribution Framework Using Proxy Gradient EstimationYi Cai, Thibaud Ardoin, Gerhard WunderICML 2025
- Regression-adjusted Monte Carlo Estimators for Shapley Values and Probabilistic ValuesR. Teal Witter, Yurong Liu, Christopher MuscoNeurIPS 2025 · 22 citations
