Slim-SC: Thought Pruning for Efficient Scaling with Self-Consistency
Colin Hong, Xu Guo, Anand Chaanan Singh, Esha Choukse, Dmitrii Ustiugov
Abstract
Recently, Test-Time Scaling (TTS) has gained increasing attention for improving LLM reasoning performance at test time without retraining the model. A notable TTS technique is Self-Consistency (SC), which generates multiple reasoning chains in parallel and selects the final answer via majority voting. While effective, the order-of-magnitude computational overhead limits its broad deployment. Prior attempts to accelerate SC mainly rely on modelbased confidence scores or heuristics with limited empirical support. For the first time, we theoretically and empirically analyze the inefficiencies of SC and reveal actionable opportunities for improvement. Building on these insights, we propose Slim-SC, a step-wise pruning strategy that identifies and removes redundant chains using inter-chain similarity at the thought level. Experiments on three STEM reasoning datasets and two recent LLM architectures show that Slim-SC reduces inference latency and KVC usage by up to 45% and 26%, respectively, with R1-Distill, while maintaining or improving accuracy, thus offering a simple yet efficient TTS alternative for SC.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 533ae23c-d97f-4a7d-847e-e16230842caaCited by top-tier papers3
- ModeX: Evaluator-Free Best-of-N Selection for Open-Ended GenerationHyeong Kyu Choi, Sharon LiACL 2026 · 3 citations
- Parallel-Probe: Towards Efficient Parallel Thinking via 2D ProbingTong Zheng, Chengsong Huang, Runpeng Dai, Yun He et al.ICML 2026
- Cut Your Losses! Learning to Prune Paths Early for Efficient Parallel ReasoningJiaxi Bi, Tongxu Luo, Wenyu Du, Zhengyang Tang et al.ACL 2026
Builds on14
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 citations
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
- Self-Refine: Iterative Refinement with Self-FeedbackAman Madaan, Niket Tandon, Prakhar Gupta, Skyler Hallinan et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 4,972 citations
- Let's Verify Step by StepHunter Lightman, Vineet Kosaraju, Yuri Burda, Harrison Edwards et al.ICLR 2024 · 3,045 citations
- Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language ModelsXuezhi Wang, Jason Wei, Dale Schuurmans, Quoc V. Le et al.ICLR 2023 · 681 citations
Related papers
- Optimal Self-Consistency for Efficient Reasoning with Large Language ModelsAustin Feng, Marius Alonso, Ambroise Odonnat, Vasilii Feofanov et al.ICML 2026 · 6 citations
- Revisiting the Test-Time Scaling of o1-like Models: Do they Truly Possess Test-Time Scaling Capabilities?Zhiyuan Zeng, Qinyuan Cheng, Zhangyue Yin, Yunhua Zhou et al.ACL 2025
- A Theoretical Study on Bridging Internal Probability and Self-Consistency for LLM ReasoningZhi Zhou, Tan Yuhao, Zenan Li, Yuan Yao et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 17 citations
- Deep Think with ConfidenceYichao Fu, Xuewei Wang, Hao Zhang, Yuandong Tian et al.ICLR 2026 · 171 citations
- Step-level Verifier-guided Hybrid Test-Time Scaling for Large Language ModelsKaiyan Chang, Yonghao Shi, Chenglong Wang, Hang Zhou et al.EMNLP 2025
