Parallel-Probe: Towards Efficient Parallel Thinking via 2D Probing
Tong Zheng, Chengsong Huang, Runpeng Dai, Yun He, Rui Liu, Xin Ni, Huiwen Bao, Kaishen Wang, Hongtu Zhu, Jiaxin Huang, Furong Huang, Heng Huang
Abstract
Parallel thinking has emerged as a promising paradigm for reasoning, yet it imposes significant computational burdens. Existing efficiency methods primarily rely on local, per-trajectory signals and lack principled mechanisms to exploit global dynamics across parallel branches. We introduce 2D probing, an interface that exposes the width–depth dynamics of parallel thinking by periodically eliciting intermediate answers from all branches. Our analysis reveals three key insights: non-monotonic scaling across width–depth allocations, heterogeneous reasoning branch lengths, and early stabilization of global consensus. Guided by these insights, we introduce , a training-free controller designed to optimize online parallel thinking. Parallel-Probe employs consensus-based early stopping to regulate reasoning depth and deviation-based branch pruning to dynamically adjust width. Extensive experiments across three benchmarks and multiple models demonstrate that Parallel-Probe establishes a superior Pareto frontier for test-time scaling. Compared to standard majority voting, it reduces sequential tokens by up to % and total token cost by over % while maintaining competitive accuracy.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext ce53d434-86d5-4fbc-8efa-d688dabf89edCited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on17
- Self-Refine: Iterative Refinement with Self-FeedbackAman Madaan, Niket Tandon, Prakhar Gupta, Skyler Hallinan et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 4,972 citations
- Let's Verify Step by StepHunter Lightman, Vineet Kosaraju, Yuri Burda, Harrison Edwards et al.ICLR 2024 · 3,045 citations
- Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language ModelsXuezhi Wang, Jason Wei, Dale Schuurmans, Quoc V. Le et al.ICLR 2023 · 681 citations
- HyperTree Proof Search for Neural Theorem ProvingGuillaume Lample, Timothée Lacroix, Marie-Anne Lachaux, Aurélien Rodriguez et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 271 citations
- Dynamic Early Exit in Reasoning ModelsChenxu Yang, Qingyi Si, Yongjie Duan, Zheliang Zhu et al.ICLR 2026 · 250 citations
Related papers
- Does Thinking More Always Help? Mirage of Test-Time Scaling in Reasoning ModelsSoumya Suvra Ghosal, Souradip Chakraborty, Avinash Reddy, Yifu Lu et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 43 citations
- HyPER: Bridging Exploration and Exploitation for Scalable LLM Reasoning with Hypothesis Path Expansion and ReductionShengxuan Qiu, Haochen Huang, Shuzhang Zhong, Pengfei Zuo et al.ICML 2026 · 1 citation
- Thought calibration: Efficient and confident test-time scalingMenghua Wu, Cai Zhou, Stephen Bates, Tommi S. JaakkolaEMNLP 2025 · 12 citations
- Let Me Think! A Long Chain of Thought Can Be Worth Exponentially Many Short OnesParsa Mirtaheri, Ezra Edelman, Samy Jelassi, Eran Malach et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 12 citations
- Tracing the Traces: Latent Temporal Signals for Efficient and Accurate ReasoningMartina G. Vilas, Safoora Yousefi, Besmira Nushi, Eric Horvitz et al.ICLR 2026 · 12 citations
