Gandalf the Red: Adaptive Security for LLMs
Niklas Pfister, Václav Volhejn, Manuel Knott, Santiago Arias, Julia Bazinska, Mykhailo Bichurin, Alan Y. Commike, Janet Darling, Peter Dienes, Matthew Fiedler, David Haber, Matthias Kraft
Abstract
Current evaluations of defenses against prompt attacks in large language model (LLM) applications often overlook two critical factors: the dynamic nature of adversarial behavior and the usability penalties imposed on legitimate users by restrictive defenses. We propose D-SEC (Dynamic Security Utility Threat Model), which explicitly separates attackers from legitimate users, models multi-step interactions, and expresses the security-utility in an optimizable form. We further address the shortcomings in existing evaluations by introducing Gandalf, a crowd-sourced, gamified red-teaming platform designed to generate realistic, adaptive attack. Using Gandalf, we collect and release a dataset of 279k prompt attacks. Complemented by benign user data, our analysis reveals the interplay between security and utility, showing that defenses integrated in the LLM (e.g., system prompts) can degrade usability even without blocking requests. We demonstrate that restricted application domains, defense-in-depth, and adaptive defenses are effective strategies for building secure and useful LLM applications.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers3
- The Attacker Moves Second: Stronger Adaptive Attacks Bypass Defenses Against LLM Jailbreaks and Prompt InjectionsMilad Nasr, Nicholas Carlini, Chawin Sitawarin, Sander V. Schulhoff et al.USENIX Security 2026 · 134 citations
- Activated LoRA: Fine-tuned LLMs for IntrinsicsKristjan Greenewald, Luis A. Lastras, Thomas Parnell, Vraj Shah et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 12 citations
- Breaking Agent Backbones: Evaluating the Security of Backbone LLMs in AI AgentsJulia Bazinska, Max Mathys, Francesco Casucci, Mateo Rojas-Carulla et al.ICLR 2026 · 10 citations
Builds on9
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 citations
- HarmBench: A Standardized Evaluation Framework for Automated Red Teaming and Robust RefusalMantas Mazeika, Long Phan, Xuwang Yin, Andy Zou et al.ICML 2024 · 1,031 citations
- AutoDAN: Generating Stealthy Jailbreak Prompts on Aligned Large Language ModelsXiaogeng Liu, Nan Xu, Muhao Chen, Chaowei XiaoICLR 2024 · 722 citations
- Tensor Trust: Interpretable Prompt Injection Attacks from an Online GameSam Toyer, Olivia Watkins, Ethan Adrian Mendes, Justin Svegliato et al.ICLR 2024 · 123 citations
- Enhancing Chat Language Models by Scaling High-quality Instructional ConversationsNing Ding, Yulin Chen, Bokai Xu, Yujia Qin et al.EMNLP 2023 · 95 citations
Related papers
- Function Calling as a Flexible LLM Defense Add-On: Capability and Application ExplorationZhenlan Ji, Daoyuan Wu, Wenxuan Wang, Pingchuan Ma et al.ISSTA 2026
- Jailbreaking Large Language Models Against Moderation Guardrails via Cipher CharactersHaibo Jin, Andy Zhou, Joe D. Menke, Haohan WangNeurIPS 2024 · 55 citations
- Ignore This Title and HackAPrompt: Exposing Systemic Vulnerabilities of LLMs Through a Global Prompt Hacking CompetitionSander Schulhoff, Jeremy Pinto, Anaum Khan, Louis-François Bouchard et al.EMNLP 2023 · 25 citations
- StealthGraph: Exposing Domain-Specific Risks in LLMs through Knowledge-Graph-Guided Harmful Prompt GenerationHuawei Zheng, Xinqi Jiang, Sen Yang, Shouling Ji et al.ACL 2026 · 1 citation
- LLMs Caught in the Crossfire: Malware Requests and Jailbreak ChallengesHaoyang Li, Huan Gao, Zhiyuan Zhao, Zhiyu Lin et al.ACL 2025
