Identifiability Challenges in Sparse Linear Ordinary Differential Equations
Cecilia Casolo, Sören Becker, Niki Kilbertus
Abstract
Dynamical systems modeling is a core pillar of scientific inquiry across natural and life sciences. Increasingly, dynamical system models are learned from data, rendering identifiability a paramount concept. For systems that are not identifiable from data, no guarantees can be given about their behavior under new conditions and inputs, or about possible control mechanisms to steer the system. It is known in the community that "linear ordinary differential equations (ODE) are almost surely identifiable from a single trajectory." However, this only holds for dense matrices. The sparse regime remains underexplored, despite its practical relevance with sparsity arising naturally in many biological, social, and physical systems. In this work, we address this gap by characterizing the identifiability of sparse linear ODEs. Contrary to the dense case, we show that sparse systems are unidentifiable with a positive probability in practically relevant sparsity regimes and provide lower bounds for this probability. We further study empirically how this theoretical unidentifiability manifests in state-of-the-art methods to estimate linear ODEs from data. Our results corroborate that sparse systems are also practically unidentifiable. Theoretical limitations are not resolved through inductive biases or optimization dynamics. Our findings call for rethinking what can be expected from data-driven dynamical system modeling and allows for quantitative assessments of how much to trust a learned linear ODE.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 522e028f-66bc-4922-bb4c-c7502b93dafbCited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on8
- The Generalization-Stability Tradeoff In Neural Network PruningBrian R. Bartoldson, Ari S. Morcos, Adrian Barbu, Gordon ErlebacherNeurIPS 2020 · 97 citations
- Neural graphical modelling in continuous-time: consistency guarantees and algorithmsAlexis Bellot, Kim Branson, Mihaela van der SchaarICLR 2022 · 57 citations
- ODEFormer: Symbolic Regression of Dynamical Systems with TransformersStéphane d'Ascoli, Sören Becker, Philippe Schwaller, Alexander Mathis et al.ICLR 2024 · 56 citations
- Predicting Ordinary Differential Equations with TransformersSören Becker, Michal Klein, Alexander Neitz, Giambattista Parascandolo et al.ICML 2023 · 28 citations
- Sparsity in Continuous-Depth Neural NetworksHananeh Aliee, Till Richter, Mikhail Solonin, Ignacio Ibarra et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 21 citations
Related papers
- Identifiability Analysis of Linear ODE Systems with Hidden ConfoundersYuanyuan Wang, Biwei Huang, Wei Huang, Xi Geng et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 6 citations
- Latent Neural ODEs with Sparse Bayesian Multiple ShootingValerii Iakovlev, Çagatay Yildiz, Markus Heinonen, Harri LähdesmäkiICLR 2023 · 3 citations
- Marrying Causal Representation Learning with Dynamical Systems for ScienceDingling Yao, Caroline Muller, Francesco LocatelloNeurIPS 2024 · 29 citations
- Bayesian Spline Learning for Equation Discovery of Nonlinear Dynamics with Quantified UncertaintyLuning Sun, Daniel Huang, Hao Sun, Jian-Xun WangNeurIPS 2022 · 23 citations
- Sparse Symplectically Integrated Neural NetworksDaniel M. DiPietro, Shiying Xiong, Bo ZhuNeurIPS 2020 · 39 citations
