Marrying Causal Representation Learning with Dynamical Systems for Science
Dingling Yao, Caroline Muller, Francesco Locatello
Abstract
Causal representation learning promises to extend causal models to hidden causal variables from raw entangled measurements. However, most progress has focused on proving identifiability results in different settings, and we are not aware of any successful real-world application. At the same time, the field of dynamical systems benefited from deep learning and scaled to countless applications but does not allow parameter identification. In this paper, we draw a clear connection between the two and their key assumptions, allowing us to apply identifiable methods developed in causal representation learning to dynamical systems. At the same time, we can leverage scalable differentiable solvers developed for differential equations to build models that are both identifiable and practical. Overall, we learn explicitly controllable models that isolate the trajectory-specific parameters for further downstream tasks such as out-of-distribution classification or treatment effect estimation. We experiment with a wind simulator with partially known factors of variation. We also apply the resulting model to real-world climate data and successfully answer downstream causal questions in line with existing literature on climate change.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers10
- Prediction-Powered Causal InferencesRiccardo Cadei, Ilker Demirel, Piersilvio De Bartolomeis, Lukas Lindorfer et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 9 citations
- Revealing Multimodal Causality with Large Language ModelsJin Li, Shoujin Wang, Qi Zhang, Feng Liu et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 5 citations
- The third pillar of causal analysis? A measurement perspective on causal representationsDingling Yao, Shimeng Huang, Riccardo Cadei, Kun Zhang et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 5 citations
- Learning Explicit Single-Cell Dynamics Using ODE RepresentationsJan-Philipp von Bassewitz, Adeel Pervez, Marco Fumero, Matthew R Robinson et al.ICLR 2026 · 5 citations
- CausalGame: Benchmarking Causal Thinking of LLM Agents in GamesZhenhao Chen, Yongqiang Chen, Chenxi Liu, Junchi Yu et al.ICML 2026 · 2 citations
Builds on32
- Self-Supervised Learning with Data Augmentations Provably Isolates Content from StyleJulius von Kügelgen, Yash Sharma, Luigi Gresele, Wieland Brendel et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 421 citations
- Weakly-Supervised Disentanglement Without CompromisesFrancesco Locatello, Ben Poole, Gunnar Rätsch, Bernhard Schölkopf et al.ICML 2020 · 361 citations
- Contrastive Learning Inverts the Data Generating ProcessRoland S. Zimmermann, Yash Sharma, Steffen Schneider, Matthias Bethge et al.ICML 2021 · 264 citations
- Weakly supervised causal representation learningJohann Brehmer, Pim de Haan, Phillip Lippe, Taco S. CohenNeurIPS 2022 · 196 citations
- Towards Nonlinear Disentanglement in Natural Data with Temporal Sparse CodingDavid A. Klindt, Lukas Schott, Yash Sharma, Ivan Ustyuzhaninov et al.ICLR 2021 · 156 citations
Related papers
- Learning General Causal Structures with Hidden Dynamic Process for Climate AnalysisMinghao Fu, Biwei Huang, Zijian Li, Yujia Zheng et al.ICML 2026
- On the Identifiability of Switching Dynamical SystemsCarles Balsells Rodas, Yixin Wang, Yingzhen LiICML 2024 · 9 citations
- Identifiable Latent Polynomial Causal Models through the Lens of ChangeYuhang Liu, Zhen Zhang, Dong Gong, Mingming Gong et al.ICLR 2024 · 21 citations
- Nonparametric Identifiability of Causal Representations from Unknown InterventionsJulius von Kügelgen, Michel Besserve, Wendong Liang, Luigi Gresele et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 127 citations
- Causal Component AnalysisWendong Liang, Armin Kekic, Julius von Kügelgen, Simon Buchholz et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 65 citations
