Interaction is necessary for distributed learning with privacy or communication constraints
Yuval Dagan, Vitaly Feldman
Abstract
Local differential privacy (LDP) is a model where users send privatized data to an untrusted central server whose goal it to solve some data analysis task. In the non-interactive version of this model the protocol consists of a single round in which a server sends requests to all users then receives their responses. This version is deployed in industry due to its practical advantages and has attracted significant research interest.
Our main result is an exponential lower bound on the number of samples necessary to solve the standard task of learning a large-margin linear separator in the non-interactive LDP model. Via a standard reduction this lower bound implies an exponential lower bound for stochastic convex optimization and specifically, for learning linear models with a convex, Lipschitz and smooth loss. These results answer the questions posed by Smith, Thakurta, and Upadhyay (IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy 2017) and Daniely and Feldman (NeurIPS 2019). Our lower bound relies on a new technique for constructing pairs of distributions with nearly matching moments but whose supports can be nearly separated by a large margin hyperplane. These lower bounds also hold in the model where communication from each user is limited and follow from a lower bound on learning using non-adaptive statistical queries.
-
- Part of the work was done while the author was at Google Research. 1 More formally, the equivalence is for a more restricted way to measure privacy based on composition of the privacy parameters of each message sent by a user.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers3
- Private Rank Aggregation in Central and Local ModelsDaniel Alabi, Badih Ghazi, Ravi Kumar, Pasin ManurangsiAAAI 2022 · 12 citations
- Bounding the Excess Risk for Linear Models Trained on Marginal-Preserving, Differentially-Private, Synthetic DataYvonne Zhou, Mingyu Liang, Ivan Brugere, Danial Dervovic et al.ICML 2024 · 3 citations
- On Learning and Refutation in Noninteractive Local Differential PrivacyAlexander Edmonds, Aleksandar Nikolov, Toniann PitassiNeurIPS 2022
Builds on2
Related papers
- Improved Analysis of Sparse Linear Regression in Local Differential Privacy ModelLiyang Zhu, Meng Ding, Vaneet Aggarwal, Jinhui Xu et al.ICLR 2024 · 5 citations
- Faster Algorithms for User-Level Private Stochastic Convex OptimizationAndrew Lowy, Daogao Liu, Hilal AsiNeurIPS 2024 · 4 citations
- Learning with User-Level PrivacyDaniel Levy, Ziteng Sun, Kareem Amin, Satyen Kale et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 113 citations
- Lightweight Protocols for Distributed Private Quantile EstimationAnders Aamand, Fabrizio Boninsegna, Abigail Gentle, Jacob Imola et al.ICML 2025
- Improved Rates for Differentially Private Stochastic Convex Optimization with Heavy-Tailed DataGautam Kamath, Xingtu Liu, Huanyu ZhangICML 2022 · 63 citations
