Spectrum Tuning: Post-Training for Distributional Coverage and In-Context Steerability
Taylor Sorensen, Benjamin Newman, Jared Moore, Chan Young Park, Jillian Fisher, Niloofar Mireshghallah, Liwei Jiang, Yejin Choi
Abstract
Language model post-training has enhanced instruction-following and performance on many downstream tasks, but also comes with an often-overlooked cost on tasks with many possible valid answers. On many tasks such as creative writing, synthetic data generation, or steering to diverse preferences, models must cover an entire distribution of outputs, rather than a single correct answer. We characterize three desiderata for conditional distributional modeling: in-context steerability, valid output space coverage, and distributional alignment, and document across three model families how current post-training can reduce these properties. In particular, we disambiguate between two kinds of in-context learning: ICL for eliciting existing underlying knowledge or capabilities, and in-context steerability, where a model must use in-context information to override its priors and steer to a novel data generating distribution. To better evaluate and improve these desiderata, we introduce Spectrum Suite, a large-scale resource compiled from data sources and spanning tasks requiring models to steer to and match diverse distributions ranging from varied human preferences to numerical distributions and more. We find that while current post-training techniques elicit underlying capabilities and knowledge, they hurt models' ability to flexibly steer in-context. To mitigate these issues, we propose Spectrum Tuning, a post-training method using Spectrum Suite to improve steerability and distributional coverage. We find that Spectrum Tuning often improves over pretrained and typical instruction-tuned models, enhancing steerability, spanning more of the output space, and improving distributional alignment on held-out datasets.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on30
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 citations
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 24,707 citations
- Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward ModelRafael Rafailov, Archit Sharma, Eric Mitchell, Christopher D. Manning et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 10,924 citations
- Measuring Massive Multitask Language UnderstandingDan Hendrycks, Collin Burns, Steven Basart, Andy Zou et al.ICLR 2021 · 7,905 citations
- Finetuned Language Models are Zero-Shot LearnersJason Wei, Maarten Bosma, Vincent Y. Zhao, Kelvin Guu et al.ICLR 2022 · 4,966 citations
Related papers
- The Missing Alignment Link of In-context Learning on SequencesHarshvardhan Agarwal, Sunita SarawagiICML 2025
- Annotations Mitigate Post-Training Mode CollapseJacob Mitchell Springer, Madhu Advani, Lukas Aichberger, Arwen Bradley et al.ICML 2026 · 1 citation
- Scaling Instruction-tuned LLMs to Million-token Contexts via Hierarchical Synthetic Data GenerationLinda He, Jue Wang, Maurice Weber, Shang Zhu et al.ICLR 2025
- Less is Enough: Synthesizing Diverse Data in Feature Space of LLMsZhongzhi Li, Xuansheng Wu, Yijiang Li, Lijie Hu et al.ICML 2026 · 1 citation
- How Does the Pretraining Distribution Shape In-Context Learning? A Fundamental Trade-OffWaïss Azizian, Ali HasanICML 2026
